Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a link to community developed smart contract languages #927

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

nielstron
Copy link
Contributor

@nielstron nielstron commented Jan 16, 2023

Checklist

  • I have read the How to Contribute.
  • I have run yarn build after adding my changes without getting any errors.

Updating documentation or Bugfix

The Cardano smart contract page is the first search result when looking for "Smart contract development on Cardano". It is important to fight the misconception that Cardano allows only Haskell contracts and to show the strength and diversity of the Cardano community. it would hence be great to either list community led alternatives directly or link to the list provided by the community when introducing potential new developers to Cardano.

@OlofBlomqvist
Copy link
Contributor

OlofBlomqvist commented Jan 16, 2023

I think we should not separate out Aiken or Eopsin in a way that make them seem like second rate languages but include them directly in the list like plutus and marlowe already are on this page. After all, this page is also for the community, by the community :)

@nielstron
Copy link
Contributor Author

Great :) As you can see there are many languages that should be listed but maybe we can reuse the introduction from the Aiken doc to create a short article on each and then have each project add details

@nielstron nielstron closed this Jan 16, 2023
@rphair rphair mentioned this pull request Jan 16, 2023
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants