plutus: 1.30 -> 1.34.1 #1544
plutus: 1.30 -> 1.34.1 #1544
Conversation
ch1bo
force-pushed
the
master
branch
2 times, most recently
from
53b33e9
to
8d8d3a3
Compare
|
Currently waiting for IntersectMBO/ouroboros-consensus#1207 to progress on 1.32 |
locallycompact
force-pushed
the
lc/plutus-1.31
branch
2 times, most recently
from
4b22075
to
73c1aa6
Compare
locallycompact
force-pushed
the
lc/plutus-1.31
branch
2 times, most recently
from
e1f2dc3
to
31f0f44
Compare
hydra-plutus/scripts/mDeposit.plutus
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think we would want to keep this file.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It doesn't seem to be in the tests for this branch. I think the script got merged in the refactor but not the logic.
| @@ -41,3 +41,6 @@ benchmarks: True | |||
|
|
|||
| -- Always show detailed output for tests | |||
| test-show-details: direct | |||
|
|
|||
| allow-newer: base | |||
| allow-newer: plutus-ledger-api | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Which packages do need these constraints? There is a nice syntax here to provide more context. I think it goes like: allow-newer: somepkg:base to say that somepkg needs to have its upper bounds removed for base
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We don't this is is noise.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is noise from ghc 9.10. Not relevant to this PR.
locallycompact
force-pushed
the
lc/plutus-1.31
branch
4 times, most recently
from
61aae8f
to
662e3b9
Compare
locallycompact
force-pushed
the
lc/plutus-1.31
branch
from
662e3b9
to
aefb8f6
Compare
locallycompact
force-pushed
the
lc/plutus-1.31
branch
from
aefb8f6
to
53960e9
Compare
locallycompact
force-pushed
the
lc/plutus-1.31
branch
from
53960e9
to
87f63df
Compare
|
I don't see the rationale for this PR (in isolation). Shall we just continue with #1680 instead? |
|
Yes. |
No description provided.