Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Generate .sha256sum files for release artifacts #2323

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Aug 28, 2024
Merged

Conversation

twm
Copy link
Contributor

@twm twm commented Aug 27, 2024

I am very much not confident that sha256sum is available on the Windows runner images, so unsure that this will work in its current form (hence the draft status).

If sha256sum is not available, I could easily do the work in Python, which I see is available on the runners.

Another possibility: rather than uploading the artifacts one-by-one to the release (which allows partial failure), I could restructure the build to temporarily store the artifacts and then download them all before generating the release. That'd happen in a Linux environment where sha256sum is available.

Please let me know your preference!

I am *very much* not confident that sha256sum is available on the
Windows runner images, so unsure that this will work in its current
form.
Copy link
Owner

@casey casey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! It's probably best not to make the different jobs depend on each other, since it might complicate debugging if something breaks.

On macOS you'll have to use shasum -a 256, which I think is also available on Linux, so you can use that on all non-windows machines.

If shasum -a 256 isn't available on Windows (I have no idea, but it's probably worth a shot, who knows what they have installed on the runners.) you can use certutil -hashfile FILE SHA256. (As much as I would like to pretend that I somehow knew this, Claude told me.)

So maybe change it to use shasum -a 256 on all platforms, and I'll kick off a job by pushing a test branch to GitHub.

Also, see the comment about possibly avoiding needing to create another output variable.

files: ${{ steps.package.outputs.archive }}
files: |
${{ steps.package.outputs.archive }}
${{ steps.package.outputs.archive-checksum }}
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you avoid needing to create another output variable by doing this:

Suggested change
${{ steps.package.outputs.archive-checksum }}
${{ steps.package.outputs.archive }}.sha256sum

@twm
Copy link
Contributor Author

twm commented Aug 27, 2024

On macOS you'll have to use shasum -a 256, which I think is also available on Linux, so you can use that on all non-windows machines.

It looks like that's a Perl thing, and Perl is installed on the Windows runners. I'll standardize on it.

@twm twm marked this pull request as ready for review August 27, 2024 23:06
@twm
Copy link
Contributor Author

twm commented Aug 27, 2024

Hopefully this works! 🤞

@twm
Copy link
Contributor Author

twm commented Aug 28, 2024

So shasum for Mac and Linux and sha256sum for Windows. 😅

Copy link
Owner

@casey casey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I tried certutil, however although it calculates SHA2 hashes, it doesn't actually output them as HASH\tFILE.

Humorously, I originally saw that sha256sum was failing on macOS, and didn't pay attention to whether it worked on Windows. It actually is installed on Windows, via Git Bash. So I switched it back to shasum -a 256 on Linux and Mac, and sha256sum on Windows.

@casey casey merged commit 10ebaec into casey:master Aug 28, 2024
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants