-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 42
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove dependency on nebulous in proof generation #68
Remove dependency on nebulous in proof generation #68
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #68 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 95.54% 98.70% +3.15%
==========================================
Files 7 6 -1
Lines 382 386 +4
==========================================
+ Hits 365 381 +16
+ Misses 12 3 -9
+ Partials 5 2 -3
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM,
[blocking question] should we delete the entire internal package now that we're not using it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agree with @evan-forbes we should delete the internal package entirely.
Whoops, keep on forgetting you can only request one review. Sorry |
dfbe254
to
e667319
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Poking @liamsi for re-review since changes requested. |
Co-authored-by: John Adler <[email protected]>
@liamsi please re-review |
bulld is failing due to codecov upload failure |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK
Poking @liamsi for re-review since changes requested. |
@liamsi bump |
Sorry for the delay on my end. All requested changes were addressed. This is good to go! |
@adlerjohn can be merged now? |
Use the same recursive approach as in nmt.Root() to generate proof
Removes the dependency on Celestiaorg/merkletree in proof generation