Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Analyse how index_mail_get_/ set_physical_size works #26

Closed
jrse opened this issue May 24, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Analyse how index_mail_get_/ set_physical_size works #26

jrse opened this issue May 24, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@jrse
Copy link
Contributor

jrse commented May 24, 2017

we see different behaviour on our system, the function index_mail_get_physical_size does not always return the correct mail size.

@jrse jrse assigned jrse and pburow and unassigned jrse May 24, 2017
@pburow
Copy link
Contributor

pburow commented May 30, 2017

After update of master branch index_mail_get/set_physical_size works

peter-mauritius pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 16, 2017
renamed the storage-rados module to storage-rbox.

(Note: change dovecot config also: plugin name is storage_rbox)
peter-mauritius pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 8, 2017
renamed the storage-rados module to storage-rbox.

(Note: change dovecot config also: plugin name is storage_rbox)
peter-mauritius pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 8, 2017
renamed the storage-rados module to storage-rbox.

(Note: change dovecot config also: plugin name is storage_rbox)
@jrse jrse mentioned this issue Apr 18, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants