-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement Intl.NumberFormat.prototype.formatToParts #5105
Merged
chakrabot
merged 2 commits into
chakra-core:master
from
jackhorton:intl/nf-formattoparts
May 9, 2018
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
15,137 changes: 7,602 additions & 7,535 deletions
15,137
lib/Runtime/Library/InJavascript/Intl.js.bc.32b.h
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
15,136 changes: 7,602 additions & 7,534 deletions
15,136
lib/Runtime/Library/InJavascript/Intl.js.bc.64b.h
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
13,782 changes: 6,923 additions & 6,859 deletions
13,782
lib/Runtime/Library/InJavascript/Intl.js.nojit.bc.32b.h
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
13,780 changes: 6,922 additions & 6,858 deletions
13,780
lib/Runtime/Library/InJavascript/Intl.js.nojit.bc.64b.h
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm surprised the Linux build didn't complain at you for not having
fields
marked as aField
, since it can hold a recycler pointer. Any idea why that would be?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, looks like the checker only applies that rule to classes that have ever been recycler-allocated themselves, and NumberFormatPartsBuilder is only created on the stack. Carry on.
In reply to: 186459626 [](ancestors = 186459626)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I should probably still mark it as a Field in case this ever needs to be created in the heap in the future.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I though the pointer itself would be a Field, not the thing being pointed at, like
Field(UNumberFormatFields *)
. Do I have this backwards?In reply to: 186466305 [](ancestors = 186466305)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe you're correct, all the
Field
specifiers on this class should contain the whole typeThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nope, you're right.