Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cargo: restrict unicode-segmentation to ~1.1.0 #967

Merged

Conversation

mgeisler
Copy link
Contributor

@mgeisler mgeisler commented May 23, 2017

Version 1.2.0 of unicode-segmentation adds code that use the "?"
operator, which in turn requires Rust 1.13.0. However, clap currently
still works with Rust 1.11.0 and this caused build failures:

https://travis-ci.org/kbknapp/clap-rs/jobs/235010822

The changes since 1.1.0 seem to be related cursors/iterators and I
think clap can work fine without them.

This was found as part of #845. See also unicode-rs/unicode-segmentation#26.


This change is Reviewable

@mention-bot
Copy link

@mgeisler, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @jimmycuadra, @kbknapp and @tormol to be potential reviewers.

The newly released version 1.2.0 of unicode-segmentation adds code
that use the "?" operator, which in turn requires Rust 1.13.0.
However, clap currently still works with Rust 1.11.0 and this caused
build failures:

  https://travis-ci.org/kbknapp/clap-rs/jobs/235010822

The changes since 1.1.0 seem to be related cursors/iterators and I
think clap can work fine without them.
@mgeisler mgeisler force-pushed the restrict-unicode-segmentation-version branch from 7ad588d to b05a3eb Compare May 23, 2017 07:06
@mgeisler mgeisler changed the title cargo: restrict unicode-segmentation to 1.1.x cargo: restrict unicode-segmentation to ~1.1.0 May 23, 2017
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented May 23, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.02%) to 91.836% when pulling b05a3eb on mgeisler:restrict-unicode-segmentation-version into 2923515 on kbknapp:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.02%) to 91.836% when pulling b05a3eb on mgeisler:restrict-unicode-segmentation-version into 2923515 on kbknapp:master.

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.02%) to 91.836% when pulling b05a3eb on mgeisler:restrict-unicode-segmentation-version into 2923515 on kbknapp:master.

@jimmycuadra
Copy link
Contributor

Is there a way to get this mention bot thing to stop mentioning me? I tried blocking its account but I still got notified here.

@kbknapp
Copy link
Member

kbknapp commented May 23, 2017

@jimmycuadra I apologise I'll set it up to only ping me or collaborators

@mgeisler
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @kbknapp, any change to get this merged?

@kbknapp
Copy link
Member

kbknapp commented May 28, 2017

Apologies, I'm out of town right now so this slipped my mind. @homu r+

@homu
Copy link
Contributor

homu commented May 28, 2017

📌 Commit b05a3eb has been approved by kbknapp

@homu
Copy link
Contributor

homu commented May 28, 2017

⌛ Testing commit b05a3eb with merge a0cad8d...

homu added a commit that referenced this pull request May 28, 2017
…r=kbknapp

cargo: restrict unicode-segmentation to ~1.1.0

Version 1.2.0 of unicode-segmentation adds code that use the "?"
operator, which in turn requires Rust 1.13.0. However, clap currently
still works with Rust 1.11.0 and this caused build failures:

  https://travis-ci.org/kbknapp/clap-rs/jobs/235010822

The changes since 1.1.0 seem to be related cursors/iterators and I
think clap can work fine without them.

This was found as part of #845. See also unicode-rs/unicode-segmentation#26.

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/kbknapp/clap-rs/967)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@homu
Copy link
Contributor

homu commented May 28, 2017

💥 Test timed out

@kbknapp kbknapp merged commit dd4c41e into clap-rs:master May 28, 2017
@mgeisler
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the approval! :-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants