-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add mergeKey to IdentityDefinition #3037
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
SDK surface and docs LGTM.
f5c13cb
to
6e7b698
Compare
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ | |||
{ | |||
"name": "@codahq/packs-sdk", | |||
"version": "1.7.10-prerelease.1", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
don't you mean 1.7.11?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(though we should have already been on 11-prerelease technically)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah yup, I had to temporarily change the version to 1.7.10
to get make release-manual
to work.
59b5de2
to
09d6fd9
Compare
schema.ts
Outdated
@@ -992,6 +992,14 @@ export interface IdentityDefinition { | |||
dynamicUrl?: string; | |||
/** The ID of another pack, if you are trying to reference a value from different pack. */ | |||
packId?: number; | |||
/** | |||
* By default, result sets returned by dynamic sync tables will not be merged together for the purposes of presenting |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
perhaps "merged together across different dynamicUrl values"?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yup, will update before merging. (Since I released already though won't cut another release for the correction.).
@@ -2,8 +2,6 @@ | |||
|
|||
This changelog keeps track of all changes to the Packs SDK. We follow conventions from [keepachangelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/). | |||
|
|||
## [Unreleased] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why remove this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was wrestling with make release-manual
- thought maybe I could bypass release notes for this release since there are no external-facing updates.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
in the future, i think it'd be better to do releases as separate PRs from the actual changes
09d6fd9
to
6e2587f
Compare
Adding property for internal use for now.
PTAL @coda/packs