Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

⚡️ Speed up VectorDBQA.validate_search_type() by 6% in libs/langchain/langchain/chains/retrieval_qa/base.py #48

Open
wants to merge 12 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

codeflash-ai[bot]
Copy link

@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot commented Mar 13, 2024

📄 VectorDBQA.validate_search_type() in libs/langchain/langchain/chains/retrieval_qa/base.py

📈 Performance improved by 6% (0.06x faster)

⏱️ Runtime went down from 1.54μs to 1.46μs

Explanation and details

(click to show)

Your Python program already follows good coding practices, and it is efficient enough. Since it doesn't involve handling big data or any computational intensive tasks, further optimization might not have a significant impact. But, as a general Python programming optimization, using local variables instead of global ones makes accessing faster. So, in this context, storing the result of 'search_type' in values in a variable and reusing it might be slightly more efficient. Here is the slightly improved version.

But remember, Python's built-in operators and functions are highly optimized and are generally more efficient than custom-typed code. And also, the best way to make your code faster is to profile the code and find where most of the time/memory is spent.

Correctness verification

The new optimized code was tested for correctness. The results are listed below.

🔘 (none found) − ⚙️ Existing Unit Tests

✅ 13 Passed − 🌀 Generated Regression Tests

(click to show generated tests)
# imports
import pytest  # used for our unit tests
from pydantic import (  # assuming BaseRetrievalQA is a BaseModel from pydantic
    BaseModel, root_validator)

# function to test

class BaseRetrievalQA(BaseModel):
    # Assuming BaseRetrievalQA is a BaseModel from pydantic, otherwise we need the actual implementation
    pass
from langchain.chains.retrieval_qa.base import VectorDBQA

# unit tests

# Test valid search_type values
@pytest.mark.parametrize("search_type", ["similarity", "mmr"])
def test_validate_search_type_valid(search_type):
    # Given a valid search_type value
    values = {"search_type": search_type}
    # When validate_search_type is called
    result = VectorDBQA.validate_search_type(values)
    # Then the original values should be returned unchanged
    assert result == values

# Test invalid search_type values
@pytest.mark.parametrize("search_type", ["random", "", None, 123])
def test_validate_search_type_invalid(search_type):
    # Given an invalid search_type value
    values = {"search_type": search_type}
    # When validate_search_type is called, a ValueError should be raised
    with pytest.raises(ValueError) as excinfo:
        VectorDBQA.validate_search_type(values)
    # Then the error message should contain the invalid search_type
    assert f"search_type of {search_type} not allowed" in str(excinfo.value)

# Test edge cases
@pytest.mark.parametrize("search_type", [None, " SIMILARITY ", "Similarity", "similarity2", "similarity!"])
def test_validate_search_type_edge_cases(search_type):
    # Given a search_type value that is an edge case
    values = {"search_type": search_type}
    # When validate_search_type is called
    if search_type is None or search_type.strip().lower() not in ("similarity", "mmr"):
        # Then a ValueError should be raised if search_type is None or not a valid option
        with pytest.raises(ValueError):
            VectorDBQA.validate_search_type(values)
    else:
        # Otherwise, the original values should be returned unchanged
        result = VectorDBQA.validate_search_type(values)
        assert result == values

# Test special scenarios
@pytest.mark.parametrize("search_type", ["", " "*1000, "; DROP TABLE users; --"])
def test_validate_search_type_special_scenarios(search_type):
    # Given a search_type value that represents a special scenario
    values = {"search_type": search_type}
    # When validate_search_type is called
    with pytest.raises(ValueError):
        # Then a ValueError should be raised for empty, extremely long, or potentially malicious strings
        VectorDBQA.validate_search_type(values)

# Test missing search_type key
def test_validate_search_type_missing_key():
    # Given a dictionary without the search_type key
    values = {}
    # When validate_search_type is called
    result = VectorDBQA.validate_search_type(values)
    # Then the original values should be returned unchanged
    assert result == values

# Test non-standard input types for search_type
@pytest.mark.parametrize("search_type", [["similarity"], {"type": "similarity"}, True])
def test_validate_search_type_non_standard_inputs(search_type):
    # Given a non-standard input type for search_type
    values = {"search_type": search_type}
    # When validate_search_type is called
    with pytest.raises(ValueError):
        # Then a ValueError should be raised as the input type is not a string
        VectorDBQA.validate_search_type(values)

codeflash-ai bot and others added 12 commits February 16, 2024 21:14
…_import_baidu_qianfan_endpoint-2024-02-16T21.21.16

⚡️ Speed up `_import_baidu_qianfan_endpoint()` by 122,591% in `libs/langchain/langchain/llms/__init__.py`
… `libs/langchain/langchain/llms/__init__.py`"
…-function-_import_baidu_qianfan_endpoint-2024-02-16T21.21.16

Revert "⚡️ Speed up `_import_baidu_qianfan_endpoint()` by 122,591% in `libs/langchain/langchain/llms/__init__.py`"
…_import_aviary-2024-02-16T21.17.19

⚡️ Speed up `_import_aviary()` by 526,374% in `libs/langchain/langchain/llms/__init__.py`
…-function-_import_aviary-2024-02-16T21.17.19

Revert "⚡️ Speed up `_import_aviary()` by 526,374% in `libs/langchain/langchain/llms/__init__.py`"
…_import_arcee-2024-02-16T21.14.24

⚡️ Speed up `_import_arcee()` by 2,804,341% in `libs/langchain/langchain/llms/__init__.py`
Your Python program already follows good coding practices, and it is efficient enough. Since it doesn't involve handling big data or any computational intensive tasks, further optimization might not have a significant impact. But, as a general Python programming optimization, using local variables instead of global ones makes accessing faster. So, in this context, storing the result of `'search_type' in values` in a variable and reusing it might be slightly more efficient. Here is the slightly improved version.


But remember, Python's built-in operators and functions are highly optimized and are generally more efficient than custom-typed code. And also, the best way to make your code faster is to profile the code and find where most of the time/memory is spent.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by CodeFlash AI
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants