Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extract Page Components #173

Open
wants to merge 34 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

hbjORbj
Copy link

@hbjORbj hbjORbj commented Jan 23, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 23, 2024

Hey there and thank you for opening this pull request! 👋🏼

We require pull request titles to follow the Conventional Commits specification and it looks like your proposed title needs to be adjusted.

Details:

No release type found in pull request title "Extract Page Components ". Add a prefix to indicate what kind of release this pull request corresponds to. For reference, see https://www.conventionalcommits.org/

Available types:
 - feat: A new feature
 - fix: A bug fix
 - docs: Documentation only changes
 - style: Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code (white-space, formatting, missing semi-colons, etc)
 - refactor: A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
 - perf: A code change that improves performance
 - test: Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests
 - build: Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies (example scopes: gulp, broccoli, npm)
 - ci: Changes to our CI configuration files and scripts (example scopes: Travis, Circle, BrowserStack, SauceLabs)
 - chore: Other changes that don't modify src or test files
 - revert: Reverts a previous commit

@hbjORbj hbjORbj force-pushed the chore/move-page-component-to-components-1 branch from 335ca14 to bf20da4 Compare January 24, 2024 08:58
@hbjORbj hbjORbj changed the title Draft: Extract Page Components Extract Page Components Jan 24, 2024
@hbjORbj hbjORbj force-pushed the chore/move-page-component-to-components-1 branch from bdded67 to 7ef69c8 Compare January 25, 2024 15:26
keithwillcode and others added 26 commits January 25, 2024 14:48
* feat: Disallow next month prefetching in booker

* renamed to include NEXT_PUBLIC

* fixed boolean expression

* Now using a variable length of days to load

* Type fixes

* Now opening all dates to be clickable

* Added turbo.json var and updated example env

* Fixed issue with selectedDate being null when first loading the page

* Updated description of variable

* Made constant for the booking days

* Type fix

* Setting the days to load for weekly view to 7

* feat: add ui and ability to fetch more on click

* feat: add ui and ability to fetch more on click

* fix: loader

* fix: banner detection

* Update packages/features/bookings/Booker/Booker.tsx

* fix: types

* Not showing HavingTroubleFindingTime component when the schedule is loading

* Only enabled on monthly view

* Correctly load initial date

* Type fix

* Fixed bugs around triggering multiple requests

* Added case for when there is no selectedDate but the month has been specified

* Types

* More types

* Check for undefined

* More typing

* More typing

---------

Co-authored-by: sean-brydon <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: sean-brydon <[email protected]>
* Check the webhook event tab and your funtionalities

* Check the webhook event tab and your funtionalities

* add changes

* add changes

* add changes

* add changes

* add changes

* add changes

* fix tests

* Refactor

---------

Co-authored-by: gitstart-calcom <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: GitStart-Cal.com <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: CarinaWolli <[email protected]>
@hbjORbj hbjORbj force-pushed the chore/move-page-component-to-components-1 branch from 42d91e3 to e9a62c3 Compare January 26, 2024 08:31
Copy link

This PR is being marked as stale due to inactivity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Feb 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants