Fix platform validation for non-default names #535
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
✅ Deploy Preview for conda-lock ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
|
Thanks! Just cut a release for this. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
#499 added logic to support lockfiles with arbitrary names, by detecting the lockfile kind based on contents rather than name.
However it missed some logic for deciding whether to validate the platform, which still infers lock-file kind from the filename.
This leads to the following error when installing from a lock-file with non-default name:
This can be worked around by passing
--no-validate-platform, but is not the intended behaviour.