Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: support for tunable retention, grace period for windowed tables #4733

Merged

Conversation

vinothchandar
Copy link
Contributor

@vinothchandar vinothchandar commented Mar 7, 2020

Description

Both clauses are optional, and will fallback to Kafka streams defaults if unspecified.

Testing done

  • Functional tests
  • Unit tests
  • Deploy in a real cluster, and test for retention

Reviewer checklist

  • Ensure docs are updated if necessary. (eg. if a user visible feature is being added or changed).
  • Ensure relevant issues are linked (description should include text like "Fixes #")

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 7, 2020

@confluentinc It looks like @vinothchandar just signed our Contributor License Agreement. 👍

Always at your service,

clabot

@vinothchandar vinothchandar force-pushed the ksql-4157-tunable-retention branch 3 times, most recently from bc6bc8d to 810072c Compare March 10, 2020 20:10
@vinothchandar vinothchandar changed the title [WIP] feat: support for tunable retention, grace period for windowed tables feat: support for tunable retention, grace period for windowed tables Mar 11, 2020
@vinothchandar vinothchandar force-pushed the ksql-4157-tunable-retention branch 2 times, most recently from 091043e to 65cde48 Compare March 13, 2020 15:33
@vinothchandar vinothchandar force-pushed the ksql-4157-tunable-retention branch 2 times, most recently from 82dd65f to 73c459c Compare March 13, 2020 18:23
@vinothchandar vinothchandar marked this pull request as ready for review March 13, 2020 18:23
@vinothchandar vinothchandar requested review from JimGalasyn and a team as code owners March 13, 2020 18:23
@vinothchandar
Copy link
Contributor Author

Tests do pass locally.. On jenkins hitting some weird failures. Looking into them

@vinothchandar
Copy link
Contributor Author

vinothchandar commented Mar 13, 2020

@JimGalasyn could you review the doc changes?

@vinothchandar vinothchandar force-pushed the ksql-4157-tunable-retention branch 2 times, most recently from 77276c8 to 07035eb Compare March 13, 2020 19:13
Copy link
Member

@JimGalasyn JimGalasyn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, with a few suggestions.

@agavra agavra self-assigned this Mar 13, 2020
@vinothchandar
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @JimGalasyn ! Updated with the suggestions

Copy link
Contributor

@agavra agavra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Thanks for fixing this outstanding issue

@vinothchandar vinothchandar merged commit 30d49b3 into confluentinc:master Mar 14, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Pull Queries: Tunable retention for windowed aggregation retention
3 participants