Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhanced retry epic #65

Closed
2 of 5 tasks
Tracked by #172
astubbs opened this issue Jan 14, 2021 · 6 comments
Closed
2 of 5 tasks
Tracked by #172

Enhanced retry epic #65

astubbs opened this issue Jan 14, 2021 · 6 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request high
Milestone

Comments

@astubbs
Copy link
Contributor

astubbs commented Jan 14, 2021

Strongly related to #34 - Monitor for progress and optionally shutdown (leave consumer group), skip message or send to DLQ #34

@astubbs
Copy link
Contributor Author

astubbs commented Jan 15, 2021

BTW @ismarslomic , did you see ParallelConsumerOptions#defaultMessageRetryDelay? Do you think there should be more documentation around it?

I've added some docs - see 917e469

@astubbs
Copy link
Contributor Author

astubbs commented Mar 2, 2021

@radoslawtwardy -> #82 Custom retry delay duration from supplier function #82

@radoslawtwardy
Copy link

radoslawtwardy commented Mar 2, 2021

Custom retry delay duration from supplier function

Possibility to define custom function will be great.

@astubbs
Copy link
Contributor Author

astubbs commented Mar 2, 2021

Custom retry delay duration from supplier function

Possibility to define custom function will be great.

Great! Try out master...astubbs:retry-delay-generator-func linked from the issue and let me know what you think of the api and functionality.

astubbs added a commit to astubbs/parallel-consumer that referenced this issue Jul 23, 2021
astubbs added a commit to astubbs/parallel-consumer that referenced this issue Jul 23, 2021
astubbs added a commit to astubbs/parallel-consumer that referenced this issue Jul 23, 2021
astubbs added a commit to astubbs/parallel-consumer that referenced this issue Jul 23, 2021
astubbs added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 23, 2021
@astubbs astubbs mentioned this issue Feb 1, 2022
64 tasks
@astubbs
Copy link
Contributor Author

astubbs commented Feb 15, 2022

Failed count available through headers: #197

@johnbyrnejb
Copy link
Contributor

Closing Issue

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request high
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants