Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

libimage: push: ignore image platform #557

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 17, 2021

Conversation

vrothberg
Copy link
Member

When pushing an image, make sure to ignore the platform of the image to
push exactly what the user wishes to. Add a test to make sure we're not
regressing in the future.

To preserve previous behaviour with respect to attempting to push a
manifest list, move the platform check below resolving to a manifest
list.

Fixes: #containers/podman/issues/10344
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg [email protected]

When pushing an image, make sure to ignore the platform of the image to
push exactly what the user wishes to.  Add a test to make sure we're not
regressing in the future.

To preserve previous behaviour with respect to attempting to push a
manifest list, move the platform check below resolving to a manifest
list.

Fixes: #containers/podman/issues/10344
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 17, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vrothberg

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@vrothberg
Copy link
Member Author

@containers/podman-maintainers PTAL

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented May 17, 2021

LGTM
Should podman add a podman push --arch ... flag?

@vrothberg
Copy link
Member Author

LGTM
Should podman add a podman push --arch ... flag?

I don't think we need that yet. I could be needed if we wanted to reference a manifest list and push a specific instance of that list but I would argue that the specific instance should be pushed directly.

@vrothberg
Copy link
Member Author

merge me before vendor dance

@TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label May 17, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit f728c09 into containers:master May 17, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants