Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename SKOPEO_CI_TAG to SKOPEO_CI_BRANCH #2083

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 7, 2023

Conversation

mtrmac
Copy link
Collaborator

@mtrmac mtrmac commented Aug 7, 2023

Originally (in #1272 ) SKOPEO_CI_TAG was also a tag of an on-registry image. That's no longer the case.

On c/image stable branches, we typically want to test against a corresponding skopeo stable branch, not against a specific frozen version on that stable branch, so the variable name has become a bit confusing.

So, rename it to SKOPEO_CI_BRANCH.

Originally (in containers#1272 )
SKOPEO_CI_TAG was also a tag of an on-registry image. That's no longer
the case.

On c/image stable branches, we typically want to test against a corresponding
skopeo stable branch, not against a specific frozen version on that stable branch,
so the variable name has become a bit confusing.

So, rename it to SKOPEO_CI_BRANCH.

Signed-off-by: Miloslav Trmač <[email protected]>
@mtrmac
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mtrmac commented Aug 7, 2023

Ref. #2071 (comment) .

Copy link
Member

@cevich cevich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@flouthoc flouthoc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mtrmac mtrmac merged commit af30818 into containers:main Aug 7, 2023
10 checks passed
@mtrmac mtrmac deleted the skopeo_ci_tag branch August 7, 2023 17:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants