Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ensure volumes can be removed when they fail to unmount #4256

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 16, 2019

Conversation

mheon
Copy link
Member

@mheon mheon commented Oct 14, 2019

Also, ensure that we don't try to mount them without root - it appears that it can somehow not error and report that mount was successful when it clearly did not succeed, which can induce this case.

We reuse the --force flag to indicate that a volume should be removed even after unmount errors. It seems fairly natural to expect that --force will remove a volume that is otherwise presenting problems.

Finally, ignore EINVAL on unmount - if the mount point no longer exists our job is done.

Fixes: #4247
Fixes: #4248

Also, ensure that we don't try to mount them without root - it
appears that it can somehow not error and report that mount was
successful when it clearly did not succeed, which can induce this
case.

We reuse the `--force` flag to indicate that a volume should be
removed even after unmount errors. It seems fairly natural to
expect that --force will remove a volume that is otherwise
presenting problems.

Finally, ignore EINVAL on unmount - if the mount point no longer
exists our job is done.

Fixes: containers#4247
Fixes: containers#4248

Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mheon

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/M labels Oct 14, 2019
logrus.Errorf("Error unmounting volume %s: %v", v.Name(), err)
} else {
return errors.Wrapf(err, "error unmounting volume %s", v.Name())
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

at line 174 we do RemoveVolume. Should we return with an error there only if the --force option isn't in play too?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we're safe to error there - if removing the volume from the DB fails it's always an error

@mheon
Copy link
Member Author

mheon commented Oct 15, 2019

@vrothberg @giuseppe @baude PTAL, want to get this in for 1.6.2

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Oct 15, 2019

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@vrothberg
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 16, 2019
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 1137c10 into containers:master Oct 16, 2019
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 26, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 26, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
6 participants