This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 28, 2020. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
etcd-backup-operator: fixed sorting of etcd backups to ensure deletion of only the oldest backups when rotating
Issue: When rotating backups based on a maximum number allowed, newer backups were being deleted when the number of digits in an etcd store revision increased.
E.g., when "v99" became "v100", the newer "v100" backup was being deleted, because the "1" in "100" was sorted to come before the first "9" in "99".
Fix: This new sorting method relies on the timestamp in each backup path, rather than the revision number.
The reason the timestamp is given precedence over the revision when sorting is because the revision could potentially go backwards when an older backup is restored.
See my comment in pkg/backup/util/util.go's SortableBackupPaths type for more details.
Fixes #2113