jobs/build-podman-os.Jenkinsfile: get podman version from main #1040
Conversation
| @@ -122,6 +130,24 @@ def cosa_memory_request_mb = 4.5 * 1024 as Integer | |||
| def ncpus = ((cosa_memory_request_mb - 512) / 1536) as Integer | |||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
| node { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
there is already a node { declaration higher up in this file.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
just me being a groovy noob :| . btw, there's another one below as well. Should I look at reusing either one or do you have a preference?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
hmm weird. yeah, just re-use the one below
There was a problem hiding this comment.
now we have two change = checkout( statements with a scm trigger in it. I don't think that's what we want either.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hmm, thinking about this further, I should grab podman version and upstream commit from the podman-next copr rpm that's fetched in the build process https://github.com/containers/podman-machine-os/blob/main/podman-image-daily/Containerfile#L31
The current podman version is hardcoded to `5.1`. This commit will allow fetching podman from upstream main branch. Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <[email protected]>
lsm5
force-pushed
the
podman-get-main-version
branch
from
c72b9a3
to
15e81f1
Compare
| @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ def generate_diskvar_json(shortcommit, arch, artifacts, staging_repo, repo) { | |||
| "container-tag": "${arch}-${shortcommit}", | |||
| "extra-kargs-string": "", | |||
| "image-type": "${artifact["platform"]}", | |||
| "container-imgref": "ostree-remote-registry:fedora:${repo}:5.1", | |||
| "container-imgref": "ostree-remote-registry:fedora:${repo}:${version}", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
probably going to want to pass in version as an argument to this function?
The current podman version is hardcoded to
5.1. This commit will allow fetching podman from upstream main branch.