Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: Move some methods inside TX Factory (backport #9421) #10039

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 31, 2021

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Aug 31, 2021

This is an automatic backport of pull request #9421 done by Mergify.
Cherry-pick of e17be87 has failed:

On branch mergify/bp/release/v0.44.x/pr-9421
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/release/v0.44.x'.

You are currently cherry-picking commit e17be874b.
  (fix conflicts and run "git cherry-pick --continue")
  (use "git cherry-pick --skip" to skip this patch)
  (use "git cherry-pick --abort" to cancel the cherry-pick operation)

Changes to be committed:
	modified:   client/tx/factory.go
	modified:   client/tx/tx.go
	modified:   client/tx/tx_test.go
	modified:   x/auth/client/tx.go
	modified:   x/genutil/client/cli/gentx.go

Unmerged paths:
  (use "git add <file>..." to mark resolution)
	both modified:   CHANGELOG.md

To fix up this pull request, you can check it out locally. See documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/github/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/checking-out-pull-requests-locally


Mergify commands and options

More conditions and actions can be found in the documentation.

You can also trigger Mergify actions by commenting on this pull request:

  • @Mergifyio refresh will re-evaluate the rules
  • @Mergifyio rebase will rebase this PR on its base branch
  • @Mergifyio update will merge the base branch into this PR
  • @Mergifyio backport <destination> will backport this PR on <destination> branch

Additionally, on Mergify dashboard you can:

  • look at your merge queues
  • generate the Mergify configuration with the config editor.

Finally, you can contact us on https://mergify.io/

<!-- < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < ☺
v                               ✰  Thanks for creating a PR! ✰
v    Before smashing the submit button please review the checkboxes.
v    If a checkbox is n/a - please still include it but + a little note why
☺ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  -->

## Description

<!-- Add a description of the changes that this PR introduces and the files that
are the most critical to review.
-->

Putting some things inside the factory (which was very anemic struct) has helped me to understand the flow. Feel free to merge if you see some benefit.

closes: #XXXX

---

Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

- [ ] Targeted PR against correct branch (see [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [ ] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
- [ ] Code follows the [module structure standards](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules/structure.md).
- [ ] Wrote unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) or specification (`x/<module>/spec/`)
- [ ] Added relevant `godoc` [comments](https://blog.golang.org/godoc-documenting-go-code).
- [ ] Added a relevant changelog entry to the `Unreleased` section in `CHANGELOG.md`
- [ ] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
- [ ] Review `Codecov Report` in the comment section below once CI passes

(cherry picked from commit e17be87)

# Conflicts:
#	CHANGELOG.md
@orijbot
Copy link

orijbot commented Aug 31, 2021

@github-actions github-actions bot added C:CLI C:x/auth C:x/genutil genutil module issues labels Aug 31, 2021
@robert-zaremba
Copy link
Collaborator

https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/pull/10037/files requires this PR (unless we do more edits).

@robert-zaremba robert-zaremba merged commit 0155244 into release/v0.44.x Aug 31, 2021
@robert-zaremba robert-zaremba deleted the mergify/bp/release/v0.44.x/pr-9421 branch August 31, 2021 17:00
robert-zaremba added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2021
robert-zaremba added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2021
* Revert "refactor: Move some methods inside TX Factory (backport #9421) (#10039)"

This reverts commit 0155244.

* remove conflict marks from changelog

* update changelog
evan-forbes pushed a commit to evan-forbes/cosmos-sdk that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2021
…osmos#10039)

* refactor: Move some methods inside TX Factory (cosmos#9421)

<!-- < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < ☺
v                               ✰  Thanks for creating a PR! ✰
v    Before smashing the submit button please review the checkboxes.
v    If a checkbox is n/a - please still include it but + a little note why
☺ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  -->

## Description

<!-- Add a description of the changes that this PR introduces and the files that
are the most critical to review.
-->

Putting some things inside the factory (which was very anemic struct) has helped me to understand the flow. Feel free to merge if you see some benefit.

closes: #XXXX

---

Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

- [ ] Targeted PR against correct branch (see [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [ ] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
- [ ] Code follows the [module structure standards](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules/structure.md).
- [ ] Wrote unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) or specification (`x/<module>/spec/`)
- [ ] Added relevant `godoc` [comments](https://blog.golang.org/godoc-documenting-go-code).
- [ ] Added a relevant changelog entry to the `Unreleased` section in `CHANGELOG.md`
- [ ] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
- [ ] Review `Codecov Report` in the comment section below once CI passes

(cherry picked from commit e17be87)

# Conflicts:
#	CHANGELOG.md

* Update CHANGELOG.md

Co-authored-by: Jonathan Gimeno <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Robert Zaremba <[email protected]>
evan-forbes pushed a commit to evan-forbes/cosmos-sdk that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2021
* Revert "refactor: Move some methods inside TX Factory (backport cosmos#9421) (cosmos#10039)"

This reverts commit 0155244.

* remove conflict marks from changelog

* update changelog
evan-forbes pushed a commit to evan-forbes/cosmos-sdk that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2021
…osmos#10039)

* refactor: Move some methods inside TX Factory (cosmos#9421)

<!-- < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < ☺
v                               ✰  Thanks for creating a PR! ✰
v    Before smashing the submit button please review the checkboxes.
v    If a checkbox is n/a - please still include it but + a little note why
☺ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  -->

## Description

<!-- Add a description of the changes that this PR introduces and the files that
are the most critical to review.
-->

Putting some things inside the factory (which was very anemic struct) has helped me to understand the flow. Feel free to merge if you see some benefit.

closes: #XXXX

---

Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

- [ ] Targeted PR against correct branch (see [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [ ] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
- [ ] Code follows the [module structure standards](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules/structure.md).
- [ ] Wrote unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) or specification (`x/<module>/spec/`)
- [ ] Added relevant `godoc` [comments](https://blog.golang.org/godoc-documenting-go-code).
- [ ] Added a relevant changelog entry to the `Unreleased` section in `CHANGELOG.md`
- [ ] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
- [ ] Review `Codecov Report` in the comment section below once CI passes

(cherry picked from commit e17be87)

# Conflicts:
#	CHANGELOG.md

* Update CHANGELOG.md

Co-authored-by: Jonathan Gimeno <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Robert Zaremba <[email protected]>
evan-forbes pushed a commit to evan-forbes/cosmos-sdk that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2021
* Revert "refactor: Move some methods inside TX Factory (backport cosmos#9421) (cosmos#10039)"

This reverts commit 0155244.

* remove conflict marks from changelog

* update changelog
Eengineer1 pushed a commit to cheqd/cosmos-sdk that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2022
…osmos#10039)

* refactor: Move some methods inside TX Factory (cosmos#9421)

<!-- < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < ☺
v                               ✰  Thanks for creating a PR! ✰
v    Before smashing the submit button please review the checkboxes.
v    If a checkbox is n/a - please still include it but + a little note why
☺ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  -->

<!-- Add a description of the changes that this PR introduces and the files that
are the most critical to review.
-->

Putting some things inside the factory (which was very anemic struct) has helped me to understand the flow. Feel free to merge if you see some benefit.

closes: #XXXX

---

Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

- [ ] Targeted PR against correct branch (see [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [ ] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
- [ ] Code follows the [module structure standards](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules/structure.md).
- [ ] Wrote unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) or specification (`x/<module>/spec/`)
- [ ] Added relevant `godoc` [comments](https://blog.golang.org/godoc-documenting-go-code).
- [ ] Added a relevant changelog entry to the `Unreleased` section in `CHANGELOG.md`
- [ ] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
- [ ] Review `Codecov Report` in the comment section below once CI passes

(cherry picked from commit e17be87)

* Update CHANGELOG.md

Co-authored-by: Jonathan Gimeno <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Robert Zaremba <[email protected]>
Eengineer1 pushed a commit to cheqd/cosmos-sdk that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2022
* Revert "refactor: Move some methods inside TX Factory (backport cosmos#9421) (cosmos#10039)"

This reverts commit 0155244.

* remove conflict marks from changelog

* update changelog
JeancarloBarrios pushed a commit to agoric-labs/cosmos-sdk that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2024
…osmos#10039)

* refactor: Move some methods inside TX Factory (cosmos#9421)

<!-- < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < ☺
v                               ✰  Thanks for creating a PR! ✰
v    Before smashing the submit button please review the checkboxes.
v    If a checkbox is n/a - please still include it but + a little note why
☺ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  -->

## Description

<!-- Add a description of the changes that this PR introduces and the files that
are the most critical to review.
-->

Putting some things inside the factory (which was very anemic struct) has helped me to understand the flow. Feel free to merge if you see some benefit.

closes: #XXXX

---

Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

- [ ] Targeted PR against correct branch (see [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [ ] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
- [ ] Code follows the [module structure standards](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules/structure.md).
- [ ] Wrote unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/`) or specification (`x/<module>/spec/`)
- [ ] Added relevant `godoc` [comments](https://blog.golang.org/godoc-documenting-go-code).
- [ ] Added a relevant changelog entry to the `Unreleased` section in `CHANGELOG.md`
- [ ] Re-reviewed `Files changed` in the Github PR explorer
- [ ] Review `Codecov Report` in the comment section below once CI passes

(cherry picked from commit e17be87)

# Conflicts:
#	CHANGELOG.md

* Update CHANGELOG.md

Co-authored-by: Jonathan Gimeno <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Robert Zaremba <[email protected]>
JeancarloBarrios pushed a commit to agoric-labs/cosmos-sdk that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2024
* Revert "refactor: Move some methods inside TX Factory (backport cosmos#9421) (cosmos#10039)"

This reverts commit 0155244.

* remove conflict marks from changelog

* update changelog
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants