-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 592
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
remaining review comments from #1613 #5539
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #5539 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 81.19% 81.22% +0.03%
==========================================
Files 197 197
Lines 15258 15258
==========================================
+ Hits 12388 12394 +6
+ Misses 2405 2399 -6
Partials 465 465
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great! left some small suggestions, LGTM! 🚀
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
small typo and quick Q
Co-authored-by: Damian Nolan <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: DimitrisJim <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm, thanks for going through these! 💯
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for following up on these various issues!
* e2e test: send incentivised packet after upgrade, add extra tests for cbs * update hermes docker image * add prune acknowledgements to successful upgrade test * use correct tx response * getting further with the e2e test, addressing a couple of other review items * refactor test to use sync incentivization instead of async * update hermes image tag * revert change that was breaking a test * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: Damian Nolan <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: DimitrisJim <[email protected]> * rename variables for consistency * rename variables for clarification --------- Co-authored-by: Damian Nolan <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: DimitrisJim <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 5d77221) # Conflicts: # e2e/README.md # e2e/tests/core/04-channel/upgrades_test.go # e2e/tests/transfer/incentivized_test.go # e2e/testsuite/grpc_query.go # e2e/testsuite/tx.go
* remaining review comments from #1613 (#5539) * e2e test: send incentivised packet after upgrade, add extra tests for cbs * update hermes docker image * add prune acknowledgements to successful upgrade test * use correct tx response * getting further with the e2e test, addressing a couple of other review items * refactor test to use sync incentivization instead of async * update hermes image tag * revert change that was breaking a test * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: Damian Nolan <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: DimitrisJim <[email protected]> * rename variables for consistency * rename variables for clarification --------- Co-authored-by: Damian Nolan <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: DimitrisJim <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 5d77221) # Conflicts: # e2e/README.md # e2e/tests/core/04-channel/upgrades_test.go # e2e/tests/transfer/incentivized_test.go # e2e/testsuite/grpc_query.go # e2e/testsuite/tx.go * remove e2e folder --------- Co-authored-by: Carlos Rodriguez <[email protected]>
Description
I think this PR covers the remaining comments left in the review of #1613.
The happy path e2e test for channel upgrades now also:
closes: #XXXX
Commit Message / Changelog Entry
see the guidelines for commit messages. (view raw markdown for examples)
Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.
docs/
) or specification (x/<module>/spec/
).godoc
comments.Files changed
in the Github PR explorer.Codecov Report
in the comment section below once CI passes.