-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
JVMCBC-1415: Support Java LTS 21 #393
JVMCBC-1415: Support Java LTS 21 #393
Conversation
* https://www.oracle.com/java/technologies/downloads/#jdk17[Oracle JDK 17 (recommended)] | ||
* https://adoptium.net/[OpenJDK 11] (Hotspot recommended) or https://www.oracle.com/java/technologies/downloads/#jdk11[Oracle JDK 11] | ||
* https://adoptium.net/[OpenJDK 1.8 with HotSpot JVM] | ||
* https://www.oracle.com/java/technologies/downloads/#java8[Oracle JDK 1.8] | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@@ -63,9 +63,10 @@ Other versions may work -- _but they are not tested and they are not supported_. | |||
|
|||
The following JDK releases are supported at time of 3.4 SDK release (October 2022): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is 21 supported right back across 3.4.x releases?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@dnault ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I looked into this - will reword tomorrow to say only latest version for JDK 21.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is 21 supported right back across 3.4.x releases?
Ideally it will be, but let's wait until we get a clean(-ish) CI run against Java 21 before making that claim.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added to line 66 (below).
No description provided.