Suggest novel E484K lineage #5
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
This looks like it is the same lineage as described in Issue #4 - designated as lineage B.1.525 |
|
Cool, thanks for pointing me in the right direction! I will forward this. |
|
Going to close the pull request @TYMichaelsen, but we've included the IDs you provided into the official list for pango lineage B.1.525. I'll be running model training today and the new release of the pangoLEARN model will be tagged here when ready. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi Pangolin team,
I'm from the Danish Covid19 Genomics Consortium (DCGC) and we are observing what seems to be a novel lineage carrying the E484K + F888L mutations in the S protein. All you need to know is in the folder "E484K-F888L_new-lineage". It would be very helpful for our investigations if this can be singled out as a separate lineage.
Best,
Thomas