Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Problem: ethermint is outdated #1294

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 22, 2024
Merged

Conversation

mmsqe
Copy link
Collaborator

@mmsqe mmsqe commented Jan 15, 2024

👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻 !!!! REFERENCE THE PROBLEM YOUR ARE SOLVING IN THE PR TITLE AND DESCRIBE YOUR SOLUTION HERE !!!! DO NOT FORGET !!!! 👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻

PR Checklist:

  • Have you read the CONTRIBUTING.md?
  • Does your PR follow the C4 patch requirements?
  • Have you rebased your work on top of the latest master?
  • Have you checked your code compiles? (make)
  • Have you included tests for any non-trivial functionality?
  • Have you checked your code passes the unit tests? (make test)
  • Have you checked your code formatting is correct? (go fmt)
  • Have you checked your basic code style is fine? (golangci-lint run)
  • If you added any dependencies, have you checked they do not contain any known vulnerabilities? (go list -json -m all | nancy sleuth)
  • If your changes affect the client infrastructure, have you run the integration test?
  • If your changes affect public APIs, does your PR follow the C4 evolution of public contracts?
  • If your code changes public APIs, have you incremented the crate version numbers and documented your changes in the CHANGELOG.md?
  • If you are contributing for the first time, please read the agreement in CONTRIBUTING.md now and add a comment to this pull request stating that your PR is in accordance with the Developer's Certificate of Origin.

Thank you for your code, it's appreciated! :)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved debug_traceCall functionality within the Ethermint module.
    • Updated eth_feeHistory to align the maximum base fee with minGasPrice.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 15, 2024

Summary of changes

CHANGELOG.md: The semantic difference in the provided hunk involves the addition of an update related to fixing and improving debug_traceCall and eth_feeHistory in the ethermint module.

integration_tests/test_min_gas_price.py: The change introduces a new assertion to ensure that the nextBaseFee aligns the maximum base fee with the minGasPrice in eth_feeHistory.

Instructions

Generate the below sections using H2 header for each:

- **Walkthrough**: A high-level summary of the overall change instead of specific files within 80 words.
- **Changes**: A markdown table of files and their change summaries. Group files with similar changes together into a single row to save space. Shorten long paths by using ellipsis for skippable parts.

	
- **Poem**: Below the changes, include a whimsical, short poem (4-5 lines max) written by a rabbit to celebrate the changes.
			Format the poem as a quote using the ">" symbol and feel free to use ASCII art or emojis where relevant.

For this task, update the existing content (provided below within triple quotes) based on the above instructions, or if it is still valid, repeat it verbatim:

Walkthrough

The recent changes focus on enhancing the ethermint module, particularly improving the debug_traceCall and eth_feeHistory functionalities. These updates likely aim to refine debugging and fee history features within the Ethereum-compatible module, providing a more robust and reliable experience for developers.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
CHANGELOG.md Addition of updates related to fixing and improving debug_traceCall and eth_feeHistory in the ethermint module.
integration_tests/test_min_gas_price.py Introduces a new assertion to align nextBaseFee with the maximum base fee using minGasPrice in eth_feeHistory.

🐇✨

In the realm of code where the ether bunnies hop,
A trace was tangled, the flow did stop.
With a twitch of a nose and a swift little fix,
The calls now traced, the devs in the mix!
🥕🔧✨

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: mmsqe <[email protected]>
@mmsqe mmsqe marked this pull request as ready for review January 15, 2024 01:41
@mmsqe mmsqe requested a review from a team as a code owner January 15, 2024 01:41
@mmsqe mmsqe requested review from JayT106 and leejw51crypto and removed request for a team January 15, 2024 01:41
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ea65bfa and c5bc905.
Files ignored due to path filters (3)
  • go.mod is excluded by: !**/*.mod
  • go.sum is excluded by: !**/*.sum
  • gomod2nix.toml is excluded by: !**/*.toml
Files selected for processing (1)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 1
CHANGELOG.md (1)
  • 5-5: The entry for PR Problem: ethermint is outdated #1294 is correctly placed under the "UNRELEASED" section and is properly formatted with a link to the PR, providing a clear description of the update to ethermint for fixing and improving debug_traceCall.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 15, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (c2d8b40) 35.88% compared to head (d6ea89b) 35.81%.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1294      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   35.88%   35.81%   -0.07%     
==========================================
  Files         116      116              
  Lines       10698    10698              
==========================================
- Hits         3839     3832       -7     
- Misses       6482     6492      +10     
+ Partials      377      374       -3     

see 2 files with indirect coverage changes

@mmsqe mmsqe requested a review from macong-cdc January 18, 2024 01:33
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c5bc905 and 442ee38.
Files ignored due to path filters (3)
  • go.mod is excluded by: !**/*.mod
  • go.sum is excluded by: !**/*.sum
  • gomod2nix.toml is excluded by: !**/*.toml
Files selected for processing (2)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • integration_tests/test_min_gas_price.py (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • CHANGELOG.md
Additional comments: 1
integration_tests/test_min_gas_price.py (1)
  • 120-123: The new assertion at lines 120-123 checks if the nextBaseFee aligns with minGasPrice in eth_feeHistory. Ensure that the hardcoded hex value hex(10000000000000) is consistent with the minGasPrice set in the configuration and that it is not subject to change that would require updating this test. If minGasPrice is configurable, consider retrieving it dynamically in the test to avoid hardcoding.
Verification successful

The search across all files for 'minGasPrice' using a case-insensitive grep has yielded two results:

  1. integration_tests/test_min_gas_price.py: This is the test file we are already aware of, which contains the comment about nextBaseFee aligning with minGasPrice.

  2. app/upgrades.go: This file contains a line where MinGasPrice is set to sdk.NewDec(10000000000000). This value matches the hardcoded hex value in the test (hex(10000000000000)), which suggests that the test is indeed checking against the correct, expected minGasPrice as configured in the application code.

Given this information, we can confirm that the hardcoded value in the test aligns with the minGasPrice set in the application's upgrade logic.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that the hardcoded minGasPrice in the test aligns with the configuration
fd 'min_gas_price*.jsonnet' --exec cat {} \; | grep 'minGasPrice'

Length of output: 68



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any JSON or JSON-like configuration files that might contain the 'minGasPrice' setting
fd '\.json$|\.jsonnet$' --exec grep -H 'minGasPrice' {} \;

Length of output: 61



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Broaden the search to include all files and use a case-insensitive grep to find 'minGasPrice'
rg -i 'minGasPrice'

Length of output: 269

go.mod Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 442ee38 and d6ea89b.
Files ignored due to path filters (3)
  • go.mod is excluded by: !**/*.mod
  • go.sum is excluded by: !**/*.sum
  • gomod2nix.toml is excluded by: !**/*.toml
Files selected for processing (1)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • CHANGELOG.md

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants