Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Problem: parallel tx execution not integrated #1377

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 15, 2024

Conversation

yihuang
Copy link
Collaborator

@yihuang yihuang commented Apr 8, 2024

Solution:

  • update ethermint and dependencies
  • fix sdk 50 integration

👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻 !!!! REFERENCE THE PROBLEM YOUR ARE SOLVING IN THE PR TITLE AND DESCRIBE YOUR SOLUTION HERE !!!! DO NOT FORGET !!!! 👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻

PR Checklist:

  • Have you read the CONTRIBUTING.md?
  • Does your PR follow the C4 patch requirements?
  • Have you rebased your work on top of the latest master?
  • Have you checked your code compiles? (make)
  • Have you included tests for any non-trivial functionality?
  • Have you checked your code passes the unit tests? (make test)
  • Have you checked your code formatting is correct? (go fmt)
  • Have you checked your basic code style is fine? (golangci-lint run)
  • If you added any dependencies, have you checked they do not contain any known vulnerabilities? (go list -json -m all | nancy sleuth)
  • If your changes affect the client infrastructure, have you run the integration test?
  • If your changes affect public APIs, does your PR follow the C4 evolution of public contracts?
  • If your code changes public APIs, have you incremented the crate version numbers and documented your changes in the CHANGELOG.md?
  • If you are contributing for the first time, please read the agreement in CONTRIBUTING.md now and add a comment to this pull request stating that your PR is in accordance with the Developer's Certificate of Origin.

Thank you for your code, it's appreciated! :)

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 8, 2024

Important

Auto Review Skipped

More than 25% of the files skipped due to max files limit. The review is being skipped to prevent a low-quality review.

121 files out of 182 files are above the max files limit of 50. Please upgrade to Pro plan to get higher limits.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
versiondb/multistore.go Fixed Show fixed Hide fixed
app/app.go Fixed Show fixed Hide fixed
Comment on lines +526 to +531
for key := range rs.listeners {
ls := rs.listeners[key]
if ls != nil {
cache = append(cache, ls.PopStateCache()...)
}
}

Check warning

Code scanning / CodeQL

Iteration over map Warning

Iteration over map may be a possible source of non-determinism
Comment on lines +1130 to +1145
for _, key := range app.keys {
keys = append(keys, key)
}

Check warning

Code scanning / CodeQL

Iteration over map Warning

Iteration over map may be a possible source of non-determinism
Comment on lines +1133 to +1148
for _, key := range app.tkeys {
keys = append(keys, key)
}

Check warning

Code scanning / CodeQL

Iteration over map Warning

Iteration over map may be a possible source of non-determinism
Comment on lines +1136 to +1151
for _, key := range app.memKeys {
keys = append(keys, key)
}

Check warning

Code scanning / CodeQL

Iteration over map Warning

Iteration over map may be a possible source of non-determinism
Comment on lines +1139 to +1154
for _, key := range app.okeys {
keys = append(keys, key)
}

Check warning

Code scanning / CodeQL

Iteration over map Warning

Iteration over map may be a possible source of non-determinism
Comment on lines +1222 to +1244
for _, m := range app.ModuleManager.Modules {
if moduleWithName, ok := m.(module.HasName); ok {
moduleName := moduleWithName.Name()
if appModule, ok := moduleWithName.(appmodule.AppModule); ok {
modules[moduleName] = appModule
}
}
}

Check warning

Code scanning / CodeQL

Iteration over map Warning

Iteration over map may be a possible source of non-determinism
Comment on lines +38 to +40
for _, k := range storeKeys {
stores[k] = NewKVStore(versionDB, k, nil)
}

Check warning

Code scanning / CodeQL

Iteration over map Warning

Iteration over map may be a possible source of non-determinism
CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 8, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 18.24324% with 242 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 35.42%. Comparing base (6986727) to head (72394ab).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1377       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   16.47%   35.42%   +18.95%     
===========================================
  Files          80      123       +43     
  Lines        5124     9422     +4298     
===========================================
+ Hits          844     3338     +2494     
- Misses       4204     5727     +1523     
- Partials       76      357      +281     
Files Coverage Δ
app/versiondb.go 84.61% <100.00%> (+8.14%) ⬆️
memiavl/multitree.go 76.01% <100.00%> (ø)
memiavl/proof.go 91.74% <ø> (ø)
memiavl/tree.go 74.10% <100.00%> (ø)
store/rootmulti/import.go 0.00% <ø> (ø)
store/rootmulti/snapshot.go 0.00% <ø> (ø)
store/setup.go 0.00% <ø> (ø)
versiondb/backend_test_utils.go 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
versiondb/client/changeset.go 45.76% <100.00%> (ø)
versiondb/client/cmd.go 0.00% <ø> (ø)
... and 44 more

... and 36 files with indirect coverage changes

memiavl/db.go Show resolved Hide resolved
memiavl/db.go Show resolved Hide resolved
memiavl/db.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@yihuang yihuang marked this pull request as ready for review April 8, 2024 09:16
@yihuang yihuang requested a review from a team as a code owner April 8, 2024 09:16
@yihuang yihuang requested review from mmsqe and devashishdxt and removed request for a team April 8, 2024 09:16
Copy link
Collaborator

@mmsqe mmsqe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

might add ValidateProto and wait for block for test

integration_tests/configs/default.jsonnet Show resolved Hide resolved
cmd/cronosd/cmd/root.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@yihuang yihuang force-pushed the block-stm branch 5 times, most recently from ff5f2d6 to bcec245 Compare April 11, 2024 10:11
@yihuang yihuang mentioned this pull request Apr 15, 2024
13 tasks
@yihuang yihuang force-pushed the block-stm branch 2 times, most recently from ff1f018 to 455f90e Compare April 15, 2024 06:29
@yihuang yihuang requested a review from mmsqe April 15, 2024 06:29
Solution:
- update ethermint and dependencies
- fix sdk 50 integration

Co-authored-by: mmsqe <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: yihuang <[email protected]>

recover client

for more info, cosmos/ibc-go#3674

fix ibc

for more info, https://ibc.cosmos.network/main/migrations/v7-to-v8#params-migration

update deps

fix app hash mismatch

cleanup send_enable test
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants