Problem: testground no log on failure

[yihuang]

Solution:

• add exception handling

👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻 !!!! REFERENCE THE PROBLEM YOUR ARE SOLVING IN THE PR TITLE AND DESCRIBE YOUR SOLUTION HERE !!!! DO NOT FORGET !!!! 👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻

PR Checklist:

• Have you read the CONTRIBUTING.md?
• Does your PR follow the C4 patch requirements?
• Have you rebased your work on top of the latest master?
• Have you checked your code compiles? (make)
• Have you included tests for any non-trivial functionality?
• Have you checked your code passes the unit tests? (make test)
• Have you checked your code formatting is correct? (go fmt)
• Have you checked your basic code style is fine? (golangci-lint run)
• If you added any dependencies, have you checked they do not contain any known vulnerabilities? (go list -json -m all | nancy sleuth)
• If your changes affect the client infrastructure, have you run the integration test?
• If your changes affect public APIs, does your PR follow the C4 evolution of public contracts?
• If your code changes public APIs, have you incremented the crate version numbers and documented your changes in the CHANGELOG.md?
• If you are contributing for the first time, please read the agreement in CONTRIBUTING.md now and add a comment to this pull request stating that your PR is in accordance with the Developer's Certificate of Origin.

Thank you for your code, it's appreciated! :)

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Refactor
  • Restructured the execution logic for improved clarity and reliability.
  • Enhanced error handling by isolating output collection in a finally block.
  • Streamlined the sequence of operations by relocating the echo server initiation.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes involve a refactoring of the run function in the stateless.py file, which now delegates execution logic to a new helper function called do_run. The output collection code has been moved to a finally block within the run function to ensure it executes regardless of the success of do_run. Additionally, the call to run_echo_server has been relocated to do_run, clarifying the execution sequence.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
testground/benchmark/benchmark/stateless.py	- Restructured run function to delegate logic to do_run. - Moved output collection to a finally block. - Relocated run_echo_server call to do_run. - Added new function do_run(home: str, cronosd: str, group: str, cfg: dict).

Possibly related PRs

• Problem: testground validator load generator not configurable #1576: This PR also modifies the run function in stateless.py, altering the execution logic, which relates to the restructuring in the main PR.

Poem

🐇 In the code where echoes play,
A helper function found its way.
With logic clear and flow refined,
Output waits, no bugs to bind.
Oh, what joy in lines of code,
A rabbit hops down this bright road! 🌟

---

Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e2b0a65 and 01d9fa5.

Files selected for processing (1)

• testground/benchmark/benchmark/stateless.py (1 hunks)

Additional comments not posted (2)

testground/benchmark/benchmark/stateless.py (2)

185-198: LGTM!

The refactoring of the run function improves the code structure and error handling:

• Delegating the execution logic to the do_run helper function enhances the separation of concerns.
• Moving the output collection code into a finally block ensures it is executed regardless of exceptions, improving reliability.
• The output collection functionality remains unchanged.

Overall, these changes streamline the code and maintain the same behavior.

---

200-201: LGTM!

The new do_run helper function improves the execution flow:

• It handles the main running logic, including starting the echo server and waiting for peers.
• Relocating the call to run_echo_server to do_run ensures it is executed as part of the running process.

The changes enhance the clarity of the execution sequence and maintain the correct behavior.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 15.24%. Comparing base (e2b0a65) to head (01d9fa5).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1581   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   15.24%   15.24%           
=======================================
  Files          67       67           
  Lines        4874     4874           
=======================================
  Hits          743      743           
  Misses       4037     4037           
  Partials       94       94