Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make explore_DL2 notebook faster and less memory-hungry #1231

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 14, 2024
Merged

Conversation

moralejo
Copy link
Collaborator

Make explore_DL2 notebook faster and less memory-hungry by keeping only relevant variables and ignoring from the start very low gammaness events

variables and ignoring from the start very low gammaness events
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 14, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (6315c2a) 72.67% compared to head (378ebb9) 72.67%.
Report is 14 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1231   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   72.67%   72.67%           
=======================================
  Files         132      132           
  Lines       13655    13655           
=======================================
  Hits         9924     9924           
  Misses       3731     3731           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@moralejo moralejo requested review from morcuended and R-Grau and removed request for morcuended February 14, 2024 16:27
R-Grau
R-Grau previously approved these changes Feb 14, 2024
@moralejo moralejo merged commit 050056a into main Feb 14, 2024
9 checks passed
@moralejo moralejo deleted the dl2_exploration branch February 14, 2024 18:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants