Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correct number of ucts jumps #840

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 3, 2022
Merged

Correct number of ucts jumps #840

merged 5 commits into from
Jan 3, 2022

Conversation

moralejo
Copy link
Collaborator

@moralejo moralejo commented Jan 3, 2022

Make sure not to double-count the number of UCTS jumps occurring in a run. Previous version counted each jump again in every subsequent subrun.

Make sure not to double-count the number of UCTS jumps occurring in a run. Previous version counted each jump again in every subsequent subrun.
@moralejo moralejo requested a review from maxnoe January 3, 2022 11:40
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 3, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #840 (8e10263) into master (cf5bfe7) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #840   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   84.99%   84.99%           
=======================================
  Files          72       72           
  Lines        5564     5564           
=======================================
  Hits         4729     4729           
  Misses        835      835           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update cf5bfe7...8e10263. Read the comment docs.

@moralejo moralejo marked this pull request as draft January 3, 2022 12:16
@moralejo moralejo marked this pull request as ready for review January 3, 2022 12:23
maxnoe
maxnoe previously approved these changes Jan 3, 2022
@moralejo moralejo marked this pull request as draft January 3, 2022 14:55
nonzero does not work with pandas dataframe (would need to convert with .to_numpy, but np.where does not have that problem)
@moralejo moralejo marked this pull request as ready for review January 3, 2022 15:08
@moralejo moralejo requested a review from maxnoe January 3, 2022 15:27
@moralejo moralejo merged commit 7095079 into master Jan 3, 2022
@moralejo moralejo deleted the correct_ucts_jumps branch January 3, 2022 16:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants