Ctar1 fixes

[maxnoe]

Changes to make it fully work with EVBv6 data, not yet ready, will update as more test data is taken

Missing:

• Read info on event-preprocessing done by EVB
• Apply only needed steps
• Missing module handling in code branch for new data format data (do we need this?)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 12 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (273ec6d) 89.48% compared to head (24e6138) 89.42%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

❗ Current head 24e6138 differs from pull request most recent head e868560. Consider uploading reports for the commit e868560 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #199      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.48%   89.42%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files          20       21       +1     
  Lines        2245     2346     +101     
==========================================
+ Hits         2009     2098      +89     
- Misses        236      248      +12     

Files	Coverage Δ
src/ctapipe_io_lst/multifiles.py	91.97% <100.00%> (+0.17%)	⬆️
src/ctapipe_io_lst/pointing.py	90.44% <100.00%> (+0.21%)	⬆️
src/ctapipe_io_lst/tests/test_calib.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/ctapipe_io_lst/tests/test_cta_r1.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/ctapipe_io_lst/tests/test_pointing.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/ctapipe_io_lst/evb_preprocessing.py	95.65% <95.65%> (ø)
src/ctapipe_io_lst/__init__.py	88.95% <95.71%> (+0.33%)	⬆️
src/ctapipe_io_lst/calibration.py	62.24% <52.94%> (-0.72%)	⬇️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[maxnoe]

This PR is already pretty large and is enough to get analysis working of data taken with EVBv6 without corrections applied or with manually specifying which corrections have already been applied.

Could you please review @FrancaCassol @moralejo or @SeiyaNozaki ?

I'll open another PR for the missing module and the automatic detection of calibration steps already performed by EVB

[moralejo]

Had a look at seems ok to me, but better if sb else checks it too...

[moralejo]

So this will not work yet with data with missing modules?

[maxnoe]

No, not yet, see my comment above.

I'd like to separate that part into a second PR, with proper dummy test data and so on. This one will get pretty large if I want to include everything.