DQM: Adding protections for runs with 21 masked pixels (due to shutter)

[hashkar]

fixing the 21 pixels issues for old runs: addin a check first.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: +0.01% 🎉

Comparison is base (0c65774) 3.08% compared to head (17b5789) 3.09%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master     #63      +/-   ##
=========================================
+ Coverage    3.08%   3.09%   +0.01%     
=========================================
  Files          36      36              
  Lines        3571    3553      -18     
=========================================
  Hits          110     110              
+ Misses       3461    3443      -18     

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
src/nectarchain/dqm/camera_monitoring.py	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/nectarchain/dqm/charge_integration.py	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/nectarchain/dqm/dqm_summary_processor.py	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/nectarchain/dqm/mean_camera_display.py	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/nectarchain/dqm/mean_waveforms.py	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/nectarchain/dqm/start_calib.py	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/nectarchain/dqm/trigger_statistics.py	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[jlenain]

Hi @hashkar !
Did you try your changes on your side ? For run 2943, I get strange camera displays, possibly the mask on the 21 pixels is not properly handled:

but:

[jlenain]

@hashkar , what is the status of this PR ?

[hashkar]

Hi @jlenain, can we close this pull request. I will do another one that contains all the fixes discussed here. Since it has been a while since I made changes I have many conflicts that i need to solve. I will solve them in another branch and make a new pull request

[jlenain]

Hi @hashkar !
OK, I will close it, then.

[jlenain]

Followed up in #80