Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

APP-1: Add MVP of basic weather application features #4

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

NickAnderegg
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@NickAnderegg NickAnderegg added the CTO.ai Review Automated CTO.ai bot code review label Apr 25, 2024

weather(queryParams.lat, queryParams.lon, queryParams.timezone).then((weatherData) => {
res.json(weatherData)
})
})

api.listen(PORT, HOST)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here are potential problems that could occur in this patch:

  1. There is no error handling for the asynchronous operations (such as calling APIs). When working with Promises, it's important to account for failures or exceptions.

  2. There is no validation or sanitization of the IP address used in requestCityFromIP(), anonymizeip(), and geoip(). This can lead to potential attacks if the user provides malicious input.

  3. The weather API is always called with hardcoded coordinates regardless of the client's location (return weather("43.7001", "-79.4163", "America/Toronto")). The code does not use the geolocation result to request weather data.

  4. In '/weather' route handler, even though validation for query params is done, if any param is missing, the function still continues executing and makes a call to the weather() function. This may result in an application failure.

  5. The function requestCoordsFromIP is imported but never used.

  6. Error messages should follow a standard format, preferably a JSON format. Sending just a text in response might confuse the clients expecting a JSON formatted response. Also, HTTP 400 status messages should provide information on what parameters were missing or incorrect (not done in '/weather').

  7. It would also be more secure to limit exposed endpoints. If an endpoint isn't required by users (ex. /geolocate), consider removing it or adding access controls to minimize security risks.

Suggested corrections include:

  • Add .catch() to Promise chains to handle errors.
  • Validate and sanitize inputs.
  • Use geolocation results to get weather data specific to the client's location.
  • Inside '/weather' route, return after sending error message if params are missing.
  • Remove unused imports.
  • Send detailed error messages and in standard formats (preferably JSON).
  • Restrict exposure of unnecessary API endpoints.

},
"author": "",
"license": "ISC",
"dependencies": {
"express": "^4.17.1",
"mysql": "^2.18.1",
"pug": "^3.0.2"
},
"devDependencies": {
"nodemon": "^3.1.0"
}
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This package.json pull request seems to mostly be correct with the introduction of "nodemon" as a development dependency and a new script "dev". However, there is one potential problem with the patch.

The usage of nodemon ./index.js localhost 8080 may potentially cause issues. Nodemon by itself doesn't take host and port arguments - it's not an HTTP server. If index.js is an Express app (or similar) that takes these parameters to set up a server, they should be handled within the script itself, not passed in this way.

Here how it could look assuming that index.js uses Express:

"dev": "nodemon ./index.js"

Then within your index.js:

const app = express();
const PORT = process.env.PORT || 8080;
const HOST = process.env.HOST || 'localhost';

app.listen(PORT, HOST, () => {
  console.log(`Server running at http://${HOST}:${PORT}`);
});

In short, the PR might need revision for handling of localhost and 8080 under the "dev" script command, as the current setup might not work as expected.

}

const localTimezone = getLocalTimezone()
document.querySelector('#geolocate').addEventListener('click', geolocate)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are no syntax errors in the code, and most functions seem reasonable. However, there are a few potential problems:

  1. Code Ordering: const localTimezone = getLocalTimezone() is called before it's logged in the geolocate function. If the timezone is not required earlier, you may want to suggest moving this inside geolocate to ensure it is set at the point of use.

  2. Inline Comment Without Implementation: There's an inline comment // function updateWeatherData with no code following it. Is a function definition missing here?

  3. Security: Be careful about using .innerHTML, as it can potentially lead to XSS (cross-site scripting) attacks when dealing with user input or unsanitized data since it interprets the included string as HTML. In this case, it does not seem to be directly handling user-dependent strings, but it would be safer to use .textContent whenever possible.

  4. Error Handling: getGeolocationFromIP function doesn't have error handling for the fetch request. It might be advisable to wrap this in a try/catch block to handle any network errors or issues with the response that might arise.

  5. Precision Loss: In the anonymizeCoordinate function, Number.toFixed() returns a string. This change could lead to precision loss in subsequent numeric calculations. Make sure this conversion back and forth between numeric types and string doesn't introduce bugs elsewhere in your application.

  6. Use of Global Variables: localTimezone variable is defined globally. Beware of defining variables globally, as it may result in unexpected behavior if other scripts modify them.

  7. Redundant console.log statements: There is a console.log statement used to log the local timezone and success/failure messages. While these are helpful during development/testing stages, they should probably not exist in production code. Consider setting up a more robust logging mechanism that can be turned on and off based on the environment.

  8. Directly calling DOM API: The DOM API (document.querySelector) is used directly across multiple functions, which could impact performance in larger DOM structures. Consider assigning the selected elements to variables and reusing them where necessary. This also applies to error handling—if an element does not exist or cannot be found, this could lead to runtime errors.

text-decoration-style: dotted;
text-decoration-color: #175DFD;
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The git patch provided shows a number of changes to CSS properties on various selectors. The changes seem oriented towards changing the layout and theming with no critical errors detected in code syntax or CSS property values.

However, there are several commented-out properties scattered throughout the code. These can be considered "dead" code if not used, and it is generally considered good practice to remove any lines that are unused for readability and maintainability. For example:

  • /* width: fit-content; */ in #header
  • /* margin: auto 5%; */ in #rocket and #message
  • /* margin: 20px 0 50px; */ in :is(p, div)
  • /* text-align: center; */ and /* align-items: center; */ in #forecast
  • /* #forecast .forecastLabel {...} */ this set of commented-out rules should just be removed unless needed soon.
  • /* width: 100%; */ in #currentTemperature.

In #content h3, you've defined text-align: left;. However, this is the default behaviour of <h3> elements, so unless it's overriding another style, this line could be redundant.

Also, there's a stylistic concern - if an element has a specific id (e.g., #currentTemperature) it's not necessary to specify the parent id (#forecast in this case) in the selector. It helps to keep specificity minimal, which makes maintaining styles easier in larger applications.

Finally, the line \ No newline at end of file indicates that a newline character was not added at the end of the file. While this won't impact the functionality of the CSS code, it is considered good practice to include one because some Unix-based tools might not interpret the file correctly without it.

Again, none of these represent "errors". They're more like best practices and opinions that can vary depending on coding guidelines being followed by the project. As a reviewer I'd suggest addressing them before merging.

module.exports = function (ipAddr) {
const ipSegments = ipAddr.split('.')
return `***.***.${ipSegments[2]}.${ipSegments[3]}`
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are several potential issues in the pull request:

  1. Missing Input Validation: This code assumes that it will always receive a valid IPv4 address string as an input (ipAddr). However, there's no validation to ensure this. If we pass a string that doesn't have four sections separated by dots or a non-string type, it could potentially cause unexpected behaviour or crashes.

  2. Error-Prone Indexing: ipSegments[2] and ipSegments[3] assume that after splitting ipAddr by ., there will be at least 4 segments. An IP address with fewer segments would raise an exception.

  3. Bad Masking: Depending on the context, ***.***.${ipSegments[2]}.${ipSegments[3]} might not return a correct or meaningful IP address. The asterisks *** replace first two octets of the IP address which is unlikely to return a correctly formatted IP address.

Here is a proposed change to mitigate these issues:

module.exports = function (ipAddr) {
    if (typeof ipAddr !== 'string' || !(/^\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}$/).test(ipAddr)) {
        throw new Error('Invalid IP address');
    }

    const ipSegments = ipAddr.split('.')
    return `***.***.${ipSegments[2]}.${ipSegments[3]}`
}

In the improved version, before the processing, we first check if the input is a string and if it matches the format of an IP address using a simple regular expression (for more accurate matching, one can use an appropriate library that validates IP address strings). If the input is invalid, we throw an error.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CTO.ai Review Automated CTO.ai bot code review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant