-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 63
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Option to traverse up the directory hierarchy looking for secrets.yml #144
Conversation
- Unit tests added - Accepts a path of a filename Todo: Stop searching when we reach the highest level dir, currently, it continues to iterate
@BradleyBoutcher I started from your branch, rebased and finished the work. |
This is great, @marco-m! FYI @BradleyBoutcher is on PTO today, so he might not look at this until Monday. I noticed that your PRs don't have a signoff message on them - can you either follow the instructions here to send us a signed CLA, or amend your commits to include the signoff? Thank you!! |
Signed-off-by: Marco Molteni <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Marco Molteni <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Marco Molteni <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Marco Molteni <[email protected]>
Rationale: we accept: summon -f /abs/path/secrets.yml but not: summon -f /abs/path/secrets.yml -u since it doesn't make sense to recurse looking for something that is absolute Signed-off-by: Marco Molteni <[email protected]>
cbb3317
to
a9d7379
Compare
@izgeri added the sign-off tag. |
Signed-off-by: Marco Molteni <[email protected]>
b8a0fdd
to
401b840
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fantastic work overall. I really appreciate how thorough your testing is and the clarity of your code. There's a few small adjustments that need to be made, but this is a great contribution!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@marco-m Added a few comments as well. Can you also make sure to update the changelog too?
Signed-off-by: Marco Molteni <[email protected]>
@sgnn7 I addressed all the points but two, and left two questions for you. |
@marco-m Re-replied! Thank you for the patience as we get this through our process! |
Signed-off-by: Marco Molteni <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Marco Molteni <[email protected]>
I addressed the 2 remaining discussion points. I am surprised by the codeclimate checks, they should have failed also before? |
@marco-m The CodeClimate issues have been cleared on our side - we just added the configuration for it and we still have some cleanup to do on it. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@marco-m LGTM! I'll just check w/ @BradleyBoutcher to see if he wants to make any other notes on this.
@marco-m Thank you for the contrib! We will bundle this into a release at some point and I'll ping you when we do. |
close #122