Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Avoid passing a nullable value to Future<nn-type>.value or Completer<nn-type>.completer. #2205

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 11, 2023

Conversation

srawlins
Copy link
Member

This is cleanup work required to start enforcing this with static analysis, as per dart-lang/sdk#53253.

Real quick this issue is that this code is unsafe:

void f(Completer<int> c, int? i) {
  Future<int>.value(i); // Ouch!
  c.complete(i);        // Ouch!
}

This change should be a no-op. Adding this explicit null-assert ensures that any exception is thrown right at the null-assert.


  • I’ve reviewed the contributor guide and applied the relevant portions to this PR.
Contribution guidelines:

Note that many Dart repos have a weekly cadence for reviewing PRs - please allow for some latency before initial review feedback.

…nn-type>.completer.

This is cleanup work required to start enforcing this with static analysis, as per dart-lang/sdk#53253.

Real quick this issue is that this code is unsafe:

```dart
void f(Completer<int> c, int? i) {
  Future<int>.value(i); // Ouch!
  c.complete(i);        // Ouch!
}
```

This change should be a no-op. Adding this explicit null-assert ensures that any exception is thrown right at the null-assert.
Copy link
Contributor

@annagrin annagrin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@elliette elliette merged commit 78a5fec into master Sep 11, 2023
49 checks passed
@elliette elliette deleted the srawlins-patch-1 branch September 11, 2023 16:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants