Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[fix][broker] Upgrade jclouds #244

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 4, 2024
Merged

[fix][broker] Upgrade jclouds #244

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 4, 2024

Conversation

nikhil-ctds
Copy link
Collaborator

Modifications

Cherry-picked apache#22220

Verifying this change

  • Make sure that the change passes the CI checks.

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

If the box was checked, please highlight the changes

  • Dependencies (add or upgrade a dependency)
  • The public API
  • The schema
  • The default values of configurations
  • The threading model
  • The binary protocol
  • The REST endpoints
  • The admin CLI options
  • The metrics
  • Anything that affects deployment

Documentation

  • doc
  • doc-required
  • doc-not-needed
  • doc-complete

@nikhil-ctds nikhil-ctds self-assigned this Apr 3, 2024
@pgier @nikhil-ctds
[fix][broker] upgrade jclouds 2.5.0 -> 2.6.0 (apache#22220)
2324815 
Co-authored-by: 道君 <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Lari Hotari <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 73dc213)
@nikhil-ctds nikhil-ctds merged commit 08fcc87 into 3.1_ds Apr 4, 2024
45 of 46 checks passed
@nikhil-ctds nikhil-ctds deleted the 3.1_ds_jcloud branch April 4, 2024 09:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@srinath-ctds srinath-ctds srinath-ctds approved these changes

@zzzming zzzming Awaiting requested review from zzzming

@nicoloboschi nicoloboschi Awaiting requested review from nicoloboschi

Assignees

@nikhil-ctds nikhil-ctds

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@nikhil-ctds @srinath-ctds @pgier