Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removed remark about Dbt 0.9.6 as utils 1.0.0 is now the the default … #740

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 15, 2022

Conversation

ilanbenb
Copy link
Contributor

…version

in hub.getdbt.com/dbt-labs/dbt_utils/latest/ the lattest version in 1.0.0 so no need for the note

resolves #

This is a:

  • documentation update

Description & motivation

Checklist

  • This code is associated with an Issue which has been triaged and accepted for development.
  • I have verified that these changes work locally on the following warehouses (Note: it's okay if you do not have access to all warehouses, this helps us understand what has been covered)
    • BigQuery
    • Postgres
    • Redshift
    • Snowflake
  • I followed guidelines to ensure that my changes will work on "non-core" adapters by:
    • dispatching any new macro(s) so non-core adapters can also use them (e.g. the star() source)
    • using the limit_zero() macro in place of the literal string: limit 0
    • using dbt.type_* macros instead of explicit datatypes (e.g. dbt.type_timestamp() instead of TIMESTAMP
  • I have updated the README.md (if applicable)
  • I have added tests & descriptions to my models (and macros if applicable)
  • I have added an entry to CHANGELOG.md

…version

 in hub.getdbt.com/dbt-labs/dbt_utils/latest/ the lattest version in 1.0.0 so no need for the note
@ilanbenb
Copy link
Contributor Author

I am not sure how to add this PR to the changelog.md so I am waiting for a maintainer

Copy link
Contributor

@joellabes joellabes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good spotting! Thanks @ilanbenb

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants