-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 96
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Project roadmap #53
Comments
This was referenced Jan 28, 2021
Hello, maybe I'm asking too much but is there a timeframe for whatwg-url support? In a project I'm using webpack with some nodejs modules to target a platform that has no URL implementation and this is going to be a showstopper. |
No, there’s no timeframe at this time. There are separate whatwg URL polyfills you can certainly use in the meantime. |
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Now that I've got the tests running in Github Actions, here's my rough plan for the package, not necessarily in order:
zuul
tests only work on local branches, because secrets aren't available on PRs from forks, unless a Github Action workflow that usespull_request_target
is in place.url
implementation, and figure out which node version(s) we currently accurately targeturl
changed in node 0.10, v4, v6, and v10: this module should havev0.10.x
,v4.x
,v6.x
, andv10.x
versions published, that match those node implementations. So, the task is to publish those (this includes Update to newer version #24, update to node 7.2.1 #30, SupportsearchParams
#36, [bug] URL is not a constructor #37, url.format ignores the "slashes" prop #48, etc)After this is all done, we should be able to easily remain "in sync" with node, for the duration.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: