Adding support for ruff formatter #4645
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Running this as my ALE now. My project just deprecated black infavor of ruff format 👍 |
w0rp
previously approved these changes
Nov 5, 2023
|
Have a look at the CI issues. |
auto-merge was automatically disabled
November 13, 2023 17:39
Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds support for the new ruff formatter as requested in #4609. I took the existing ruff fixer and made a version that runs the
formatcommand. That way the user can opt into either or both of them.This is built on top of #4347 and #4393 and contains only a few tweaks (the version checking was removed because the formatter was added well after the version in question).