Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

added ability to use template cookbook for login.defs #217

Merged

Conversation

ekelson-bcove
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@ekelson-bcove
Copy link
Contributor Author

I noticed the login.defs file has a lot of comments and such. A custom template would allow an org to achieve more customization.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 5, 2018

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 6528db6 on ekelson-bcove:feature/login_def_templatecb into e05934a on dev-sec:master.

Copy link
Member

@artem-sidorenko artem-sidorenko left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ekelson-bcove thanks for this PR! May I ask you to remove the change of cookbook version?

metadata.rb Outdated
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
license 'Apache-2.0'
description 'Installs and configures operating system hardening'
long_description IO.read(File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__), 'README.md'))
version '3.1.0'
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ekelson-bcove please do not bump the cookbook version. This is done by maintainers before the release is done

@ekelson-bcove
Copy link
Contributor Author

ekelson-bcove commented Jun 25, 2018 via email

@ekelson-bcove
Copy link
Contributor Author

Fixed above

@artem-sidorenko artem-sidorenko merged commit b787f84 into dev-sec:master Jun 25, 2018
@artem-sidorenko
Copy link
Member

@ekelson-bcove thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants