feat: basic label implementation to hide dialogs #1192
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new mutation for setting system labels in a dialog management context, along with related data structures and API endpoints. It enhances functionality for managing dialog display states through the Changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
* DialogLabel * DialogLabelAssignment * DialogLabelLog
Made first rev on DisplayState Started creating SetDisplayState endpoint
Created SystemLabel entity Created LabelAssignmentLog entity Removed old dialogState
…Null Made every class sealed
updated naming of classes added labels to create dialog endpoint updated migration added swagger config added validation to set label endpoint
IFMatch added to set label some cleanup
Fargekritt
force-pushed
the
feature/basic-label-implementation
branch
from
bbb8981
to
d4ef702
Compare
Fargekritt
changed the title
Fargekritt
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 49
🧹 Outside diff range comments (2)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/EndUser/Dialogs/Queries/Search/SearchDialogQuery.cs (1)
Line range hint
1-199: Summary: SystemLabel filtering implemented, tests neededThe changes introduce a new filtering option for dialogs based on system labels, which is a valuable addition to the search functionality. The implementation is mostly correct, with a minor logical error that has been addressed in a previous comment.
To ensure the reliability and maintainability of this new feature, consider adding the following:
- Unit tests for the
SearchDialogQueryclass to verify the behavior of the newSystemLabelproperty.- Integration tests for the
SearchDialogQueryHandlerto confirm that the filtering based onSystemLabelworks as expected.- Update any existing tests that may be affected by this change.
Would you like assistance in creating these tests or opening a GitHub issue to track this task?
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/EndUser/Dialogs/Queries/Get/GetDialogQuery.cs (1)
Line range hint
178-201: LGTM: Well-implemented security measure for unauthorized URLs.The
ReplaceUnauthorizedUrlsmethod effectively prevents unauthorized access to sensitive URLs:
- It covers all types of actions (GUI and API) and transmissions.
- Using
Constants.UnauthorizedUrifor replacement is a good practice.Minor optimization suggestion:
Consider using LINQ'sForEachmethod for a more concise implementation, especially for the transmission attachments. For example:dialogTransmission.Attachments .SelectMany(a => a.Urls) .ToList() .ForEach(url => url.Url = Constants.UnauthorizedUri);This change would make the code slightly more readable and maintainable.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (20)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/EndUser/DialogLabelAssigmentLog/Queries/Search/MappingProfile.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/EndUser/DialogLabelAssigmentLog/Queries/Search/SearchDialogLabelAssignmentLogQuery.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/EndUser/DialogLabels/Commands/Set/SetDialogLabelCommand.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/EndUser/DialogLabels/Commands/Set/SetDialogLabelCommandValidator.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/EndUser/DialogLabels/Commands/Set/SetDialogLabelDto.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/EndUser/Dialogs/Queries/Get/GetDialogQuery.cs (3 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/EndUser/Dialogs/Queries/Search/SearchDialogQuery.cs (3 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/EndUser/Dialogs/Queries/Search/SearchDialogQueryValidator.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Get/GetDialogQuery.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Search/SearchDialogQuery.cs (4 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Search/SearchDialogQueryValidator.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/DialogEndUserContexts/Entities/DialogEndUserContext.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/DialogEndUserContexts/Entities/LabelAssignmentLog.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/DialogEndUserContexts/Entities/SystemLabel.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/Dialogs/Entities/DialogEntity.cs (4 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQL/EndUser/MutationTypes/Mutations.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/DialogDbContext.cs (2 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20240925075200_AddSystemLabel.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/Endpoints/V1/EndUser/DialogLabelAssigmentLogs/Search/SearchDialogLabelAssigmentLogEndpoint.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/Endpoints/V1/EndUser/DialogLabels/Set/SetDialogLabelEndpoint.cs (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (24)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/EndUser/DialogLabelAssigmentLog/Queries/Search/MappingProfile.cs (2)
7-10: LGTM: Class structure is well-defined.The
MappingProfileclass is correctly defined assealedand inherits fromProfile. The constructor is properly implemented. This structure follows good practices for AutoMapper profile classes.Also applies to: 14-14
11-13: Verify complete property mappings.The mapping configurations look correct for basic property mapping. However, ensure that all relevant properties from the source entities are properly mapped to their corresponding DTO properties.
To verify the completeness of the mappings, run the following script:
Compare the output to ensure all necessary properties are mapped.
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/DialogEndUserContexts/Entities/LabelAssignmentLog.cs (2)
6-17: LGTM: Well-structured class for logging label assignments.The
LabelAssignmentLogclass is well-designed for its purpose. It implementsIImmutableEntity, which is appropriate for logging scenarios where data should not be modified after creation. The properties cover essential information for tracking label assignments, including the action performed, the context, and who performed the action.
19-23: LGTM: Well-structured class for representing label assignment actors.The
LabelAssignmentLogActorclass is well-designed to represent the actor who performed a label assignment action. It appropriately inherits fromActorand implementsIImmutableEntity, maintaining consistency with theLabelAssignmentLogclass.src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/EndUser/DialogLabels/Commands/Set/SetDialogLabelCommandValidator.cs (2)
1-4: LGTM: Imports and namespace are appropriate.The imports and namespace declaration are correct and follow the expected structure for this validator class.
6-7: LGTM: Class declaration follows best practices.The class is correctly named, inherits from the appropriate base class, and is sealed to prevent inheritance. This follows best practices for command validators using FluentValidation.
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/DialogEndUserContexts/Entities/SystemLabel.cs (1)
6-20: LGTM: Well-structuredSystemLabelclass implementation.The
SystemLabelclass is well-designed:
- Sealed class prevents unintended inheritance.
- Enum values start from 1, avoiding potential issues with default 0 value.
MapValuemethod creates a new instance, promoting immutability.- Overall structure is clean and follows good design principles.
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/Endpoints/V1/EndUser/DialogLabelAssigmentLogs/Search/SearchDialogLabelAssigmentLogEndpoint.cs (2)
1-7: LGTM: Import statements are appropriate and relevant.The import statements cover all necessary namespaces for the implementation, including diagnostics, application features, authorization, extensions, FastEndpoints, and MediatR.
18-25: LGTM: Configure method is well-structured and follows best practices.The
Configuremethod effectively sets up the endpoint:
- Correctly specifies a GET request at "dialogs/{dialogId}/labellog".
- Applies an authorization policy for end users, enhancing security.
- Groups the endpoint under
EndUserGroup, improving organization.- Sets up Swagger description, which is great for API documentation.
These practices contribute to a well-organized and secure API structure.
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/Dialogs/Entities/DialogEntity.cs (3)
3-3: LGTM: New using statement added correctly.The new using statement for
Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain.DialogEndUserContexts.Entitiesis correctly placed and is necessary for the newDialogEndUserContextproperty.
101-104: LGTM: Improved code formatting.The indentation changes in the LINQ query within the
UpdateSeenAtmethod enhance code readability without altering functionality.
Line range hint
1-145: Verify complete implementation of the labeling system.The addition of the
DialogEndUserContextproperty aligns with the PR objectives of implementing a labeling system for dialogs. However, to ensure a comprehensive implementation:
- Verify that other necessary changes have been made across the codebase to support this new property.
- Ensure that the
DialogEndUserContextis properly initialized and used in relevant parts of the application.- Check if any database migrations are required for this change.
To assist in verifying the implementation, you can run the following script:
This script will help identify related changes and potential areas that might need attention to fully implement the labeling system.
✅ Verification successful
Complete Implementation of the Labeling System Verified
The
DialogEndUserContextand related label functionalities have been fully integrated across the codebase. All necessary usages, initializations, and database migrations are in place to support the labeling system as intended.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for usages of DialogEndUserContext and related classes/methods # Search for DialogEndUserContext usage echo "Searching for DialogEndUserContext usage:" rg --type csharp "DialogEndUserContext" # Search for label-related classes or interfaces echo "\nSearching for label-related classes or interfaces:" rg --type csharp "class.*Label|interface.*Label" # Search for methods related to label operations echo "\nSearching for methods related to label operations:" rg --type csharp "method.*(Add|Remove|Update|Get).*Label" # Search for potential database migration files echo "\nSearching for potential database migration files:" fd -e cs -e sql "migration|label"Length of output: 26558
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/DialogDbContext.cs (1)
47-48: Verify database schema updates and migrations.The new properties
DialogEndUserContextsandLabelAssignmentLogshave been added correctly to theDialogDbContext. To ensure full implementation:
- Confirm that corresponding entity configurations exist (e.g., in separate configuration classes).
- Verify that a new migration has been created to update the database schema.
- Ensure that the migration has been applied to all relevant environments.
To check for entity configurations and migrations, run:
✅ Verification successful
Database schema updates and migrations are properly implemented.
The new properties
DialogEndUserContextsandLabelAssignmentLogshave been correctly added to theDialogDbContextwith corresponding entity configurations and migration files present in the codebase. To ensure full implementation:
Entity Configurations:
- Confirm that
DialogEndUserContextConfigurationandLabelAssignmentLogConfigurationclasses are correctly set up.Migrations:
- Verify that the
20240925075200_AddSystemLabelmigration has been created and includes the necessary schema changes.- Ensure that the migration has been applied to all relevant environments (development, staging, production).
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for entity configurations echo "Searching for DialogEndUserContext configuration:" rg -i "dialogenduser.*configure" --type csharp echo "Searching for LabelAssignmentLog configuration:" rg -i "labelassignment.*configure" --type csharp # Check for migrations echo "Searching for migrations mentioning the new entities:" rg -i "dialogenduser|labelassignment" --type csharp ./MigrationsLength of output: 550
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Entity Framework migration commands in the codebase echo "Searching for migration commands in the codebase:" rg -i "Add-Migration|Update-Database" --type csharp # Search for migration classes or configurations using ast-grep echo "Searching for migration classes:" ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern $'public class $_ : Migration { $$$ }' # Search for any DbContext configurations related to the new entities echo "Searching for DbContext configurations for DialogEndUserContext and LabelAssignmentLog:" rg -i "modelBuilder.Entity<DialogEndUserContext>" --type csharp rg -i "modelBuilder.Entity<LabelAssignmentLog>" --type csharpLength of output: 625
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search the entire codebase for mentions of DialogEndUserContext and LabelAssignmentLog echo "Searching for mentions of DialogEndUserContext and LabelAssignmentLog in the codebase:" rg -i "DialogEndUserContext|LabelAssignmentLog" --type csharp # Search for any classes that inherit from Migration echo "Searching for migration classes in the codebase:" ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern $'public class $_ : Migration { $$$ }' # Search for OnModelCreating methods that configure the new entities echo "Searching for OnModelCreating configurations for DialogEndUserContext and LabelAssignmentLog:" rg -i "OnModelCreating" --type csharp | rg -i "DialogEndUserContext|LabelAssignmentLog"Length of output: 29492
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/EndUser/Dialogs/Queries/Search/SearchDialogQuery.cs (1)
11-11: LGTM: Import statement added for DialogEndUserContexts.EntitiesThe added import statement is appropriate and necessary for the new
SystemLabelproperty introduced in this file.src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/EndUser/Dialogs/Queries/Get/GetDialogQuery.cs (3)
81-82: LGTM: Improved query efficiency and added necessary context.The changes to the
SeenLogfiltering and the inclusion ofDialogEndUserContextare well-implemented:
- Filtering
SeenLogentries to those created after the dialog's last update improves query efficiency.- Including
DialogEndUserContextaligns with the PR objective of implementing a labeling system for dialogs.These changes enhance the query's performance and functionality.
Also applies to: 84-84
155-155: LGTM: Improved readability of authorization conditions.The reformatting of the conditions for setting
IsAuthorizedon actions enhances code readability:
- The logic remains unchanged.
- The separation of cases for null and non-null authorization attributes is now more explicit.
This change contributes to better code maintainability.
Also applies to: 164-164
Line range hint
1-201: Verify alignment with PR objectives: "Bin/Archive" label implementation.The changes in this file align well with the PR objectives of implementing a basic label system for dialogs:
- The inclusion of
DialogEndUserContextsuggests that labels are now part of the dialog context.- Enhanced authorization checks and URL replacement improve security.
However, I couldn't find an explicit implementation of the "Bin/Archive" system label mentioned in the PR objectives. Could you please clarify:
- Where is the "Bin/Archive" label logic implemented?
- How does it interact with the
GetDialogQueryto hide dialogs?This information will help ensure that all PR objectives are met and properly reviewed.
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/Endpoints/V1/EndUser/DialogLabels/Set/SetDialogLabelEndpoint.cs (2)
13-20: Configuration Method is Well-StructuredThe
Configuremethod correctly sets up the endpoint with the appropriate route, authorization policies, grouping, and Swagger documentation. This ensures that the endpoint is properly exposed and secured.
9-11:⚠️ Potential issuePotential Syntax Error with Primary Constructor in Class Declaration
The use of a primary constructor in the class declaration may not be supported in the current C# version you are targeting. Primary constructors are typically available for records, not classes. To ensure compatibility and avoid potential syntax errors, consider refactoring the class to use a standard constructor.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
-public sealed class SetDialogLabelEndpoint(ISender sender) : Endpoint<SetDialogLabelCommand> -{ - private readonly ISender _sender = sender ?? throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(sender)); +public sealed class SetDialogLabelEndpoint : Endpoint<SetDialogLabelCommand> +{ + private readonly ISender _sender; + + public SetDialogLabelEndpoint(ISender sender) + { + _sender = sender ?? throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(sender)); + }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/EndUser/DialogLabelAssigmentLog/Queries/Search/SearchDialogLabelAssignmentLogQuery.cs (2)
19-19: Confirm the necessity of thepartialkeyword inSearchDialogLabelAssignmentLogResultThe class
SearchDialogLabelAssignmentLogResultis declared aspublic sealed partial class.Typically, the
partialkeyword is used when a class is split across multiple files or when code generation tools expand the class definition.Please verify if the
partialkeyword is required due to the[GenerateOneOf]attribute.If not, consider removing
partialto avoid confusion.
43-46: Differentiate between not found and deleted entitiesCurrently, if the dialog is not found, you return an
EntityNotFound.Later, if the dialog is marked as deleted, you return an
EntityDeleted.Ensure that the client can distinguish between a dialog that does not exist and one that has been deleted for better error handling on the client side.
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Get/GetDialogQuery.cs (1)
86-86:⚠️ Potential issueVerify the impact of including
DialogEndUserContextwith.IgnoreQueryFilters()Including
DialogEndUserContextusing.Include(x => x.DialogEndUserContext)after invoking.IgnoreQueryFilters()may result in loading entities that are normally filtered out by global query filters, potentially exposing data that should remain hidden. Please ensure that this inclusion does not unintentionally bypass any security measures, and that appropriate authorization checks are applied.Run the following script to check if
DialogEndUserContexthas any global query filters applied:✅ Verification successful
No global query filters found on
DialogEndUserContextIncluding
DialogEndUserContextwith.Include(x => x.DialogEndUserContext)after invoking.IgnoreQueryFilters()does not bypass any global query filters since none are applied. Therefore, there is no risk of unintentionally exposing restricted data.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Identify any global query filters applied to DialogEndUserContext. # Search for query filters configured on DialogEndUserContext entities. rg --type csharp 'HasQueryFilter' -A 5 -B 2 | rg 'DialogEndUserContext' # List properties of DialogEndUserContext to assess for sensitive data. rg --type csharp 'class DialogEndUserContext' -A 20Length of output: 4605
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Search/SearchDialogQuery.cs (2)
11-11: Import statement is appropriate.The added
usingdirective brings inDialogEndUserContextentities, which are necessary for the new implementation.
187-187: Approve the addition of theProcessfilter.The
WhereIfclause correctly adds a condition to filter dialogs based on theProcessfield using a case-insensitive LIKE comparison, enhancing the query's flexibility.
| using System.Reflection.Emit; | ||
| using AutoMapper; | ||
| using Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain.DialogEndUserContexts.Entities; | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Remove unused import.
The System.Reflection.Emit import appears to be unnecessary for this file. Consider removing it to keep the imports clean and relevant.
Apply this diff to remove the unused import:
-using System.Reflection.Emit;
using AutoMapper;
using Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain.DialogEndUserContexts.Entities;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| using System.Reflection.Emit; | |
| using AutoMapper; | |
| using Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain.DialogEndUserContexts.Entities; | |
| using AutoMapper; | |
| using Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain.DialogEndUserContexts.Entities; | |
| using AutoMapper; | ||
| using Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain.DialogEndUserContexts.Entities; | ||
|
|
||
| namespace Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.Features.V1.EndUser.DialogLabelAssigmentLog.Queries.Search; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix typo in namespace.
There's a typo in the namespace: "DialogLabelAssigmentLog" should be "DialogLabelAssignmentLog" (missing 'n' in "Assignment").
Apply this diff to correct the namespace:
-namespace Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.Features.V1.EndUser.DialogLabelAssigmentLog.Queries.Search;
+namespace Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.Features.V1.EndUser.DialogLabelAssignmentLog.Queries.Search;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| namespace Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.Features.V1.EndUser.DialogLabelAssigmentLog.Queries.Search; | |
| namespace Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.Features.V1.EndUser.DialogLabelAssignmentLog.Queries.Search; |
| public string Name { get; set; } = null!; | ||
| public string Action { get; set; } = null!; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider improving null safety for non-nullable reference types.
Some properties are declared as non-nullable reference types (e.g., string, DialogEndUserContext, LabelAssignmentLogActor) but are initialized to null!. This approach bypasses the compiler's null checks and may lead to NullReferenceExceptions at runtime if these properties are not properly initialized.
Consider one of the following approaches to improve null safety:
- Initialize these properties in the constructor:
public LabelAssignmentLog(string name, string action, DialogEndUserContext context, LabelAssignmentLogActor performedBy)
{
Name = name;
Action = action;
Context = context;
PerformedBy = performedBy;
}- Use nullable reference types where appropriate:
public string? Name { get; set; }
public string? Action { get; set; }
public DialogEndUserContext? Context { get; set; }
public LabelAssignmentLogActor? PerformedBy { get; set; }Choose the approach that best fits your design and usage patterns.
Also applies to: 14-16
| public sealed class LabelAssignmentLogActor : Actor, IImmutableEntity | ||
| { | ||
| public Guid LabelAssignmentLogId { get; set; } | ||
| public LabelAssignmentLog LabelAssignmentLog { get; set; } = null!; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider improving null safety for the LabelAssignmentLog property.
The LabelAssignmentLog property is declared as a non-nullable reference type but is initialized to null!. This approach bypasses the compiler's null checks and may lead to NullReferenceExceptions at runtime if the property is not properly initialized.
Consider one of the following approaches to improve null safety:
- Initialize the property in the constructor:
public LabelAssignmentLogActor(LabelAssignmentLog labelAssignmentLog)
{
LabelAssignmentLog = labelAssignmentLog;
}- Use a nullable reference type if appropriate:
public LabelAssignmentLog? LabelAssignmentLog { get; set; }Choose the approach that best fits your design and usage patterns.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For DTOs, we have established this as a convention. It is not always possible or desirable to use contructors, and not all fields should be nullable. Therefore, we initialize reference type members with null! for explicitness.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@elsand, understood. Thank you for explaining your convention regarding DTOs and initializing reference type members with null!. I'll keep this in mind for future reviews.
✏️ Learnings added
Learnt from: elsand
PR: digdir/dialogporten#1192
File: src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/DialogEndUserContexts/Entities/LabelAssignmentLog.cs:22-22
Timestamp: 2024-10-03T06:01:04.955Z
Learning: For DTOs, initialize reference type members with `null!` when it's not possible or desirable to use constructors, and not all fields should be nullable.
Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.
| public sealed class LabelAssignmentLogActor : Actor, IImmutableEntity | ||
| { | ||
| public Guid LabelAssignmentLogId { get; set; } | ||
| public LabelAssignmentLog LabelAssignmentLog { get; set; } = null!; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider revising the one-to-one relationship between LabelAssignmentLogActor and LabelAssignmentLog.
The current design suggests a one-to-one relationship between LabelAssignmentLogActor and LabelAssignmentLog. This might not be the most efficient design if an actor can perform multiple label assignments, as it would result in duplicate actor information across multiple logs.
Consider the following alternatives:
-
Many-to-one relationship: Remove the
LabelAssignmentLogproperty fromLabelAssignmentLogActorand keep only thePerformedByproperty inLabelAssignmentLog. This allows one actor to be associated with multiple logs. -
Many-to-many relationship: If you need to maintain a bidirectional relationship, consider using a collection in
LabelAssignmentLogActor:
public class LabelAssignmentLogActor : Actor, IImmutableEntity
{
public ICollection<LabelAssignmentLog> LabelAssignmentLogs { get; set; } = new List<LabelAssignmentLog>();
}This approach would allow an actor to be associated with multiple logs and vice versa, providing more flexibility in your domain model.
| Id = table.Column<Guid>(type: "uuid", nullable: false, defaultValueSql: "gen_random_uuid()"), | ||
| CreatedAt = table.Column<DateTimeOffset>(type: "timestamp with time zone", nullable: false, defaultValueSql: "current_timestamp at time zone 'utc'"), | ||
| UpdatedAt = table.Column<DateTimeOffset>(type: "timestamp with time zone", nullable: false, defaultValueSql: "current_timestamp at time zone 'utc'"), | ||
| DialogId = table.Column<Guid>(type: "uuid", nullable: true), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Inconsistency with nullable DialogId and unique index
The DialogId column in DialogEndUserContext is nullable (line 41), but there is a unique index on it (lines 99-102). This could allow multiple records with DialogId set to NULL, which may not be the intended behavior, as unique indexes allow multiple NULL values.
Consider making DialogId non-nullable if each context must be associated with a Dialog, or adjust the index to handle NULL values appropriately.
Apply this diff to make DialogId non-nullable:
DialogId = table.Column<Guid>(type: "uuid", nullable: true),
+// Make DialogId non-nullable
+DialogId = table.Column<Guid>(type: "uuid", nullable: false),Also applies to: 99-102
| Name = table.Column<string>(type: "character varying(255)", maxLength: 255, nullable: false), | ||
| Action = table.Column<string>(type: "character varying(255)", maxLength: 255, nullable: false), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use an enumeration for the Action field in LabelAssignmentLog
The Action column is a string (line 68) with a maximum length of 255 characters. If Action has a limited and predefined set of values (e.g., "Create", "Update", "Delete"), consider using an enumeration to enforce data integrity and improve code readability.
Define an enumeration for Action and update the model accordingly to restrict values to the defined set.
| constraints: table => | ||
| { | ||
| table.PrimaryKey("PK_LabelAssignmentLog", x => x.Id); | ||
| table.ForeignKey( | ||
| name: "FK_LabelAssignmentLog_DialogEndUserContext_ContextId", | ||
| column: x => x.ContextId, | ||
| principalTable: "DialogEndUserContext", | ||
| principalColumn: "Id", | ||
| onDelete: ReferentialAction.Cascade); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential cascading delete issues between related tables
The LabelAssignmentLog table has a foreign key to DialogEndUserContext with onDelete: ReferentialAction.Cascade (lines 75-79). Similarly, the Actor table references LabelAssignmentLog with onDelete: ReferentialAction.Cascade (lines 115-120). This setup could cause a chain reaction of deletions, leading to unintended data loss across multiple tables.
Review the cascading delete behaviors to ensure they align with the desired data retention policies. Consider using Restrict or SetNull to prevent cascading deletions.
Also applies to: 115-120
| name: "FK_Actor_LabelAssignmentLog_LabelAssignmentLogId", | ||
| table: "Actor", | ||
| column: "LabelAssignmentLogId", | ||
| principalTable: "LabelAssignmentLog", | ||
| principalColumn: "Id", | ||
| onDelete: ReferentialAction.Cascade); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential data loss due to onDelete: ReferentialAction.Cascade on Actor foreign key
The foreign key constraint between the Actor table and the LabelAssignmentLog table uses onDelete: ReferentialAction.Cascade. This means that deleting a LabelAssignmentLog entry will result in the deletion of the associated Actor record. This could lead to unintended data loss in the Actor table.
Consider changing the onDelete behavior to Restrict or SetNull to prevent accidental deletions.
Apply this diff to modify the onDelete behavior:
migrationBuilder.AddForeignKey(
name: "FK_Actor_LabelAssignmentLog_LabelAssignmentLogId",
table: "Actor",
column: "LabelAssignmentLogId",
principalTable: "LabelAssignmentLog",
principalColumn: "Id",
- onDelete: ReferentialAction.Cascade);
+ onDelete: ReferentialAction.Restrict);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| name: "FK_Actor_LabelAssignmentLog_LabelAssignmentLogId", | |
| table: "Actor", | |
| column: "LabelAssignmentLogId", | |
| principalTable: "LabelAssignmentLog", | |
| principalColumn: "Id", | |
| onDelete: ReferentialAction.Cascade); | |
| name: "FK_Actor_LabelAssignmentLog_LabelAssignmentLogId", | |
| table: "Actor", | |
| column: "LabelAssignmentLogId", | |
| principalTable: "LabelAssignmentLog", | |
| principalColumn: "Id", | |
| onDelete: ReferentialAction.Restrict); |
| .WhereIf(request.VisibleAfter.HasValue, x => request.VisibleAfter <= x.VisibleFrom) | ||
| .WhereIf(request.VisibleBefore.HasValue, x => x.VisibleFrom <= request.VisibleBefore) | ||
| .WhereIf(request.SystemLabel.IsNullOrEmpty(), x => request.SystemLabel!.Contains(x.DialogEndUserContext.SystemLabelId)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct the condition in the WhereIf clause for SystemLabel.
The filter should be applied when SystemLabel is not null or empty. Currently, the condition checks if SystemLabel is null or empty, which inverts the intended logic and applies the filter when there are no SystemLabel values to filter on.
Apply this diff to fix the condition:
-.WhereIf(request.SystemLabel.IsNullOrEmpty(), x => request.SystemLabel!.Contains(x.DialogEndUserContext.SystemLabelId))
+.WhereIf(!request.SystemLabel.IsNullOrEmpty(), x => request.SystemLabel!.Contains(x.DialogEndUserContext.SystemLabelId))📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| .WhereIf(request.SystemLabel.IsNullOrEmpty(), x => request.SystemLabel!.Contains(x.DialogEndUserContext.SystemLabelId)) | |
| .WhereIf(!request.SystemLabel.IsNullOrEmpty(), x => request.SystemLabel!.Contains(x.DialogEndUserContext.SystemLabelId)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 44
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (17)
- docs/schema/V1/swagger.verified.json (12 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/EndUser/DialogLabelAssignmentLog/Queries/Search/MappingProfile.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/EndUser/DialogLabelAssignmentLog/Queries/Search/SearchDialogLabelAssignmentLogDto.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/EndUser/DialogLabelAssignmentLog/Queries/Search/SearchDialogLabelAssignmentLogQuery.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/EndUser/DialogSystemLabels/Commands/Set/SetDialogSystemLabelCommand.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/EndUser/DialogSystemLabels/Commands/Set/SetDialogSystemLabelCommandValidator.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/EndUser/DialogSystemLabels/Commands/Set/SetDialogSystemLabelDto.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/EndUser/Dialogs/Queries/Search/SearchDialogQuery.cs (3 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Search/SearchDialogQuery.cs (4 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQL/EndUser/MutationTypes/MappingProfile.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQL/EndUser/MutationTypes/Mutations.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/Endpoints/V1/EndUser/DialogLabelAssigmentLogs/Search/SearchDialogLabelAssigmentLogEndpoint.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/Endpoints/V1/EndUser/DialogLabelAssigmentLogs/Search/SearchDialogLabelAssignmentSwaggerConfig.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/Endpoints/V1/EndUser/DialogSystemLabels/Set/SetDialogSystemLabelEndpoint.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/Endpoints/V1/EndUser/DialogSystemLabels/Set/SetDialogSystemLabelSwaggerConfig.cs (1 hunks)
- tests/k6/common/testimports.js (2 hunks)
- tests/k6/tests/enduser/dialogSystemLabelLog.js (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
tests/k6/tests/enduser/dialogSystemLabelLog.js
[error] 22-22: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
[error] 24-24: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
[error] 36-36: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
[error] 38-38: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
[error] 47-47: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
[error] 49-49: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
[error] 57-57: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
[error] 11-11: This let declares a variable that is only assigned once.
'd' is never reassigned.
Safe fix: Use const instead.
(lint/style/useConst)
[error] 12-12: This let declares a variable that is only assigned once.
'r' is never reassigned.
Safe fix: Use const instead.
(lint/style/useConst)
[error] 19-19: This let declares a variable that is only assigned once.
'body' is never reassigned.
Safe fix: Use const instead.
(lint/style/useConst)
[error] 33-33: This let declares a variable that is only assigned once.
'body' is never reassigned.
Safe fix: Use const instead.
(lint/style/useConst)
[error] 57-57: This let declares a variable that is only assigned once.
'response' is never reassigned.
Safe fix: Use const instead.
(lint/style/useConst)
🔇 Additional comments (37)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/EndUser/DialogSystemLabels/Commands/Set/SetDialogSystemLabelCommandValidator.cs (1)
1-3: LGTM: Appropriate namespace and import.The use of FluentValidation and the well-structured namespace are appropriate for this validator class.
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQL/EndUser/MutationTypes/MappingProfile.cs (2)
1-2: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and concise.The imports are relevant to the functionality being implemented. AutoMapper is used for the mapping profile, and the command import is necessary for the mapping configuration.
4-4: LGTM: Namespace is appropriate and consistent.The namespace
Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQL.EndUser.MutationTypesaccurately reflects the file's location and purpose within the project structure. It's consistent with the GraphQL and end-user related functionality mentioned in the PR objectives.src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/EndUser/DialogLabelAssignmentLog/Queries/Search/MappingProfile.cs (2)
5-5: LGTM: Namespace declaration is clear and well-structured.The namespace accurately reflects the location and purpose of the class within the application structure, following a clear and organized naming convention.
7-8: LGTM: Class declaration follows best practices.The
MappingProfileclass is well-defined:
- The name clearly indicates its purpose.
- It's sealed, which prevents inheritance and can improve performance.
- Inheriting from
Profileis correct for creating an AutoMapper profile.src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/Endpoints/V1/EndUser/DialogSystemLabels/Set/SetDialogSystemLabelSwaggerConfig.cs (1)
1-6: LGTM: Namespace and class declaration.The namespace follows the file path structure, and the class is appropriately declared as public and sealed. The class name is descriptive and follows the Pascal case convention.
tests/k6/common/testimports.js (3)
8-8: LGTM: Addition ofpostEUexport aligns with PR objectives.The inclusion of
postEUin the exports is consistent with the PR's goal of adding post endpoints for end users to modify labels. This addition follows the existing naming convention and is appropriately positioned within the EU-related exports.
33-33: LGTM: Addition ofsetSystemLabelexport supports new labeling feature.The inclusion of
setSystemLabelin the dialog-related exports aligns with the PR's objective of implementing a system label for hiding dialogs. This addition is consistent with the existing naming convention and is appropriately positioned within the dialog-related exports.
Line range hint
1-33: Consider adding automated tests for the new labeling feature.While the additions to this file provide the necessary tools for testing the new labeling feature, the PR objectives mention that relevant automated tests have not been added. To ensure the reliability and correctness of the new feature, it would be beneficial to implement automated tests using these newly exported functions.
Would you like assistance in creating automated tests for the new labeling feature using
postEUandsetSystemLabel?src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/Endpoints/V1/EndUser/DialogLabelAssigmentLogs/Search/SearchDialogLabelAssignmentSwaggerConfig.cs (2)
7-10: LGTM: Class declaration and OperationId property are well-implemented.The class is correctly sealed and implements the
ISwaggerConfiginterface. The staticOperationIdproperty provides a consistent identifier for the operation, which is a good practice for Swagger configurations.
1-17: LGTM: Overall structure and consistency are good.The file is well-structured and follows C# conventions. The namespace is consistent with the file path, and the class name matches the file name. The implementation effectively configures Swagger for the search endpoint related to dialog label assignments.
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/EndUser/DialogSystemLabels/Commands/Set/SetDialogSystemLabelDto.cs (5)
6-10: LGTM: SetDialogSystemLabelDto implementationThe
SetDialogSystemLabelDtoclass is well-structured and aligns with the PR objectives. It provides a clear way to associate a system label with a specific dialog.
12-13: Clarify the necessity of SetDialogSystemLabelLabelDtoThere's a comment questioning if this class is still needed. Could you please clarify the purpose and necessity of this class in the context of the current implementation? If it's no longer required, consider removing it to keep the codebase clean.
20-35: LGTM: SetDialogSystemLabelLabelDto constructorThe constructor is well-implemented with proper input validation for both parameters. It correctly sets the Label, Namespace, and FullName properties.
64-67: LGTM: Parse method implementationThe
Parsemethod is well-implemented. It correctly uses theTryParsemethod and throws an appropriate exception when parsing fails, following the common pattern for Parse methods in .NET.
1-68: Overall assessment: Good implementation with minor suggestionsThe implementation of
SetDialogSystemLabelDtoandSetDialogSystemLabelLabelDtoaligns well with the PR objectives of managing dialog visibility through labels. The code is generally well-structured and follows good practices.Key points:
- The necessity of
SetDialogSystemLabelLabelDtoneeds clarification.- Consider simplifying the
TryParsemethod for better readability.- Add a comment explaining the commented-out code in the
TryParsemethod.These minor improvements will enhance the overall quality and maintainability of the code.
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/EndUser/Dialogs/Queries/Search/SearchDialogQuery.cs (3)
11-11: LGTM: Appropriate using statement addedThe addition of the
using Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain.DialogEndUserContexts.Entitiesstatement is appropriate for the new SystemLabel feature implementation.
179-179: LGTM: Correct SystemLabel filtering condition implementedThe filtering condition for
SystemLabelhas been correctly implemented. It now applies the filter only whenSystemLabelis provided (not null or empty), which addresses the logical error mentioned in the previous review..WhereIf(!request.SystemLabel.IsNullOrEmpty(), x => request.SystemLabel!.Contains(x.DialogEndUserContext.SystemLabelId))This implementation ensures that dialogs are filtered based on the
SystemLabelIdonly when theSystemLabellist is not null or empty.
Line range hint
1-197: Overall assessment: SystemLabel feature well-implementedThe changes in this file successfully implement the SystemLabel feature for filtering dialogs. The new property and filtering condition are correctly added, and the implementation addresses the issues mentioned in previous reviews. The code is clean, follows good practices, and aligns well with the PR objectives.
A minor suggestion was made to enhance the summary comment for the
SystemLabelproperty, but otherwise, the implementation looks good and ready for merging.docs/schema/V1/swagger.verified.json (13)
264-272: New property "systemLabel" added to CreateDialogCommand schemaThe "systemLabel" property has been added to the CreateDialogCommand schema. This new property allows setting the system label of a dialog, which appears to be for migration purposes.
The implementation looks correct and consistent with other properties in the schema. However, consider the following suggestions:
- The description mentions "Migration purposes". It might be beneficial to provide more context or documentation about when and how this property should be used.
- Consider adding an example value to help API consumers understand the expected format.
2105-2112: New property "systemLabel" added to GetDialogDto schemaThe "systemLabel" property has been added to the GetDialogDto schema, representing the current display state of a dialog.
The implementation is consistent with the CreateDialogCommand schema. However, consider the following suggestions:
- The description "Current display state." could be more informative. Consider expanding it to explain the purpose and possible values of this property.
- Add an example value to help API consumers understand the expected format and possible values.
2274-2281: New property "systemLabel" added to GetDialogDtoSO schemaThe "systemLabel" property has been added to the GetDialogDtoSO schema, which is likely used for service owner operations.
The implementation is consistent with the GetDialogDto schema. However, consider the following suggestions:
- Ensure that the description and any additional documentation for this property are consistent across all schemas where it appears.
- If there are any differences in how this property should be used or interpreted by service owners, make sure to highlight those in the description or additional documentation.
3220-3227: New property "systemLabel" added to SearchDialogDto schemaThe "systemLabel" property has been added to the SearchDialogDto schema, representing the current display state in search results.
The implementation is consistent with other schemas. However, consider the following suggestions:
- Ensure that the description and any additional documentation for this property are consistent across all schemas where it appears.
- If there are any specific search-related behaviors or considerations for this property, make sure to highlight those in the description or additional documentation.
3337-3344: New property "systemLabel" added to SearchDialogDtoSO schemaThe "systemLabel" property has been added to the SearchDialogDtoSO schema, which is likely used for service owner search operations.
The implementation is consistent with the SearchDialogDto schema. However, consider the following suggestions:
- Ensure that the description and any additional documentation for this property are consistent across all schemas where it appears.
- If there are any differences in how this property should be used or interpreted by service owners in search operations, make sure to highlight those in the description or additional documentation.
3469-3482: New enum "SystemLabel_Values" addedA new enum "SystemLabel_Values" has been added to define the possible values for the systemLabel property.
The enum definition looks correct and includes three values: "Default", "Bin", and "Archive". However, consider the following suggestions:
- Add a description for each enum value to clarify their meanings and use cases.
- Consider adding a more detailed description for the enum itself, explaining its purpose and when it should be used.
3455-3468: New schema "SetDialogSystemLabelCommand" addedA new schema "SetDialogSystemLabelCommand" has been added, likely for setting the system label of a dialog.
The schema looks correct and includes properties for optimistic concurrency control ("ifMatchDialogRevision") and the new label. However, consider the following suggestions:
- Add a description for the schema itself, explaining its purpose and when it should be used.
- Consider adding examples or more detailed descriptions for each property to guide API consumers on their proper usage.
2579-2590: New schema "LabelAssignmentLogActorDto" addedA new schema "LabelAssignmentLogActorDto" has been added, likely for logging label assignment actions.
The schema looks correct and includes properties for actorId and actorName. However, consider the following suggestions:
- Add a description for the schema itself, explaining its purpose and when it should be used.
- Consider adding descriptions for each property to clarify their meanings and expected values.
- If there are any constraints or format requirements for actorId or actorName, make sure to document them.
3360-3378: New schema "SearchDialogLabelAssignmentLogDto" addedA new schema "SearchDialogLabelAssignmentLogDto" has been added, likely for searching and retrieving label assignment logs.
The schema looks correct and includes properties for action, createdAt, name, and performedBy. However, consider the following suggestions:
- Add a description for the schema itself, explaining its purpose and when it should be used.
- Consider adding descriptions for each property to clarify their meanings and expected values.
- For the "createdAt" property, specify the expected date-time format.
- For the "action" property, consider using an enum if there's a fixed set of possible actions.
4334-4347: New query parameter "systemLabel" added to GetDialogList endpointA new query parameter "systemLabel" has been added to the GetDialogList endpoint, allowing filtering by display state.
The implementation looks correct and consistent with other query parameters. However, consider the following suggestions:
- Expand the description to provide more context on how this filter works, especially if multiple values can be provided.
- If there are any limitations or special considerations when using this filter, make sure to document them in the description.
5157-5170: New query parameter "systemLabel" added to GetDialogListSO endpointA new query parameter "systemLabel" has been added to the GetDialogListSO endpoint, allowing filtering by display state for service owners.
The implementation is consistent with the GetDialogList endpoint. However, consider the following suggestions:
- Ensure that the description and any additional documentation for this parameter are consistent with the GetDialogList endpoint.
- If there are any differences in how this filter should be used or interpreted by service owners, make sure to highlight those in the description.
4583-4639: New endpoint "/api/v1/enduser/dialogs/{dialogId}/labellog" addedA new GET endpoint for retrieving the label assignment log for a dialog has been added.
The endpoint implementation looks correct and includes appropriate response codes. However, consider the following suggestions:
- Add a description for the endpoint, explaining its purpose and when it should be used.
- Consider adding more detailed descriptions for the possible response codes, especially for error cases.
- If there are any query parameters for filtering or pagination, make sure to document them.
4761-4850: New endpoint "/api/v1/enduser/dialogs/{dialogId}/systemlabels" addedA new PUT endpoint for setting the system label of a dialog has been added.
The endpoint implementation looks correct and includes appropriate request body and response codes. However, consider the following suggestions:
- Add a description for the endpoint, explaining its purpose and when it should be used.
- Consider adding more detailed descriptions for the possible response codes, especially for error cases.
- Provide more information about the expected format and possible values for the request body.
- If there are any specific authorization requirements or limitations for this operation, make sure to document them.
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/Endpoints/V1/EndUser/DialogLabelAssigmentLogs/Search/SearchDialogLabelAssigmentLogEndpoint.cs (3)
8-10: Typo in namespace and class name persistsThe namespace and class name contain a typo: "Assigment" should be "Assignment". This issue was previously flagged and is still present. Please correct the spelling to ensure consistency throughout the codebase.
18-25: Endpoint configuration is correctThe
Configuremethod properly sets up the endpoint route, authorization policies, group, and description. The use ofGet("dialogs/{dialogId}/labellog")and the application ofAuthorizationPolicy.EndUserare appropriate.
26-33: Consider adding a catch-all case for unexpected resultsAs previously suggested, consider adding a catch-all case to handle unexpected results in the
Matchexpression. This ensures that any unforeseen result types are handled gracefully, improving the robustness of the endpoint.src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/Endpoints/V1/EndUser/DialogSystemLabels/Set/SetDialogSystemLabelEndpoint.cs (1)
9-11:⚠️ Potential issueFix invalid class constructor syntax
The class declaration uses invalid syntax. In C#, constructor parameters cannot be declared directly in class declarations unless it's a record type. Since
SetDialogSystemLabelEndpointis a class, you should define the constructor explicitly.Apply this diff to correct the syntax:
-public sealed class SetDialogSystemLabelEndpoint(ISender sender) : Endpoint<SetDialogSystemLabelCommand> -{ - private readonly ISender _sender = sender ?? throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(sender)); +public sealed class SetDialogSystemLabelEndpoint : Endpoint<SetDialogSystemLabelCommand> +{ + private readonly ISender _sender; + + public SetDialogSystemLabelEndpoint(ISender sender) + { + _sender = sender ?? throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(sender)); + }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Search/SearchDialogQuery.cs (1)
11-11: [Approved] Addition of necessary using directiveThe added
using Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain.DialogEndUserContexts.Entities;directive is appropriate as it enables the use ofDialogEndUserContextentities later in the code.
.../Features/V1/EndUser/DialogSystemLabels/Commands/Set/SetDialogSystemLabelCommandValidator.cs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| public SetDialogSystemLabelCommandValidator() | ||
| { | ||
| RuleFor(x => x.Label) | ||
| .NotNull(); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider enhancing validation rules for the Label property.
The current implementation ensures that the Label is not null, which is a good start. However, based on the PR objectives mentioning a system label (Bin/Archive), consider adding more specific validation rules.
Here are some suggestions to enhance the validation:
- Check if the Label is within a set of valid values (e.g., "Bin", "Archive").
- Validate the Label's format or length if there are any such requirements.
Example implementation:
public SetDialogSystemLabelCommandValidator()
{
RuleFor(x => x.Label)
.NotNull()
.Must(BeAValidSystemLabel).WithMessage("Invalid system label. Allowed values are: Bin, Archive");
}
private bool BeAValidSystemLabel(string label)
{
var validLabels = new[] { "Bin", "Archive" };
return validLabels.Contains(label);
}This ensures that only predefined system labels are accepted.
| using FluentValidation; | ||
|
|
||
| namespace Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.Features.V1.EndUser.DialogSystemLabels.Commands.Set; | ||
|
|
||
| public sealed class SetDialogSystemLabelCommandValidator : AbstractValidator<SetDialogSystemLabelCommand> | ||
| { | ||
| public SetDialogSystemLabelCommandValidator() | ||
| { | ||
| RuleFor(x => x.Label) | ||
| .NotNull(); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Overall assessment: Good start, but room for improvement.
The SetDialogSystemLabelCommandValidator provides a basic validation for the SetDialogSystemLabelCommand. While the current implementation is correct, there are opportunities to enhance its robustness and clarity:
- Add XML documentation to describe the purpose and usage of this validator class.
- Implement more specific validation rules for the Label property, as suggested in the previous comment.
- Consider adding unit tests to verify the validator's behavior with various input scenarios.
These improvements will help ensure the integrity of the data and make the code more maintainable.
Would you like assistance in implementing these enhancements or creating unit tests for this validator?
| public sealed class MappingProfile : Profile | ||
| { | ||
| public MappingProfile() | ||
| { | ||
| CreateMap<SetSystemLabelInput, SetDialogSystemLabelCommand>() | ||
| .ForMember(dest => dest.Label, opt => opt.MapFrom(src => src.Label)); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Missing mapping for DialogId property in MappingProfile
The MappingProfile currently maps the Label property from SetSystemLabelInput to SetDialogSystemLabelCommand. However, the DialogId property is not mapped, which may lead to incomplete data transfer.
Suggested Action:
- Add mapping for the
DialogIdproperty:
CreateMap<SetSystemLabelInput, SetDialogSystemLabelCommand>()
.ForMember(dest => dest.DialogId, opt => opt.MapFrom(src => src.DialogId))
.ForMember(dest => dest.Label, opt => opt.MapFrom(src => src.Label));🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM: MappingProfile class implementation is solid, with room for potential enhancements.
The MappingProfile class is well-structured and implements the necessary mapping for the system label feature. Here are some observations and suggestions:
- The use of a sealed class is a good practice, preventing unintended inheritance.
- The mapping configuration aligns with the PR objectives of implementing system labels.
- Explicit mapping of the
Labelproperty ensures only necessary data is transferred.
Consider the following potential enhancements:
- Verify if additional properties need to be mapped between
SetSystemLabelInputandSetDialogSystemLabelCommand. - Consider adding validation logic if there are specific requirements for the
Labelproperty (e.g., allowed values, format).
To ensure completeness of the mapping, let's verify the structure of both SetSystemLabelInput and SetDialogSystemLabelCommand:
This will help us confirm if there are any additional properties that should be mapped.
Let's proceed to verify the existence and structure of SetSystemLabelInput and SetDialogSystemLabelCommand using ripgrep for a more comprehensive search.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the structure of SetSystemLabelInput and SetDialogSystemLabelCommand
# Search for SetSystemLabelInput definition
echo "SetSystemLabelInput definition:"
ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern 'class SetSystemLabelInput { $$$ }'
echo -e "\nSetDialogSystemLabelCommand definition:"
# Search for SetDialogSystemLabelCommand definition
ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern 'class SetDialogSystemLabelCommand { $$$ }'
Length of output: 317
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for SetSystemLabelInput and SetDialogSystemLabelCommand class definitions using ripgrep.
echo "Searching for SetSystemLabelInput class definition:"
rg 'class\s+SetSystemLabelInput\b' --context 5
echo -e "\nSearching for SetDialogSystemLabelCommand class definition:"
rg 'class\s+SetDialogSystemLabelCommand\b' --context 5
Length of output: 3126
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for SetDialogSystemLabelDto class definition using ripgrep.
echo "Searching for SetDialogSystemLabelDto class definition:"
rg 'class\s+SetDialogSystemLabelDto\b' --context 5
Length of output: 1861
| using System.Reflection.Emit; | ||
| using AutoMapper; | ||
| using Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain.DialogEndUserContexts.Entities; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Remove unused import statement.
The import statement for System.Reflection.Emit is not used in this file. It's recommended to remove unused imports to keep the code clean and avoid potential confusion.
Apply this diff to remove the unused import:
-using System.Reflection.Emit;
using AutoMapper;
using Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain.DialogEndUserContexts.Entities;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| using System.Reflection.Emit; | |
| using AutoMapper; | |
| using Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain.DialogEndUserContexts.Entities; | |
| using AutoMapper; | |
| using Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain.DialogEndUserContexts.Entities; |
| [GenerateOneOf] | ||
| public sealed partial class SetDialogLabelResult : OneOfBase<Success, EntityNotFound, EntityDeleted, DomainError, ValidationError, ConcurrencyError>; | ||
|
|
||
| internal sealed class SetDialogLabelCommandHandler : IRequestHandler<SetDialogSystemLabelCommand, SetDialogLabelResult> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Inconsistent class naming: Rename handler to 'SetDialogSystemLabelCommandHandler'
The handler class SetDialogLabelCommandHandler omits 'System' from its name while handling SetDialogSystemLabelCommand. For consistency, consider renaming it to SetDialogSystemLabelCommandHandler.
Apply this diff to rename the class:
- internal sealed class SetDialogLabelCommandHandler : IRequestHandler<SetDialogSystemLabelCommand, SetDialogLabelResult>
+ internal sealed class SetDialogSystemLabelCommandHandler : IRequestHandler<SetDialogSystemLabelCommand, SetDialogSystemLabelResult>Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| */ | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| dialog.DialogEndUserContext.UpdateLabel(request.Label, currentUserInformation.UserId.ExternalIdWithPrefix, currentUserInformation.Name); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use consistent naming: Replace 'Label' with 'SystemLabel'
In line with the decision to rename 'label' to 'systemLabel', consider updating the property and method names for consistency. Replace request.Label with request.SystemLabel and UpdateLabel with UpdateSystemLabel.
Apply this diff to update the naming:
- dialog.DialogEndUserContext.UpdateLabel(request.Label, currentUserInformation.UserId.ExternalIdWithPrefix, currentUserInformation.Name);
+ dialog.DialogEndUserContext.UpdateSystemLabel(request.SystemLabel, currentUserInformation.UserId.ExternalIdWithPrefix, currentUserInformation.Name);Ensure that the property SystemLabel exists in SetDialogSystemLabelCommand and that the method UpdateSystemLabel is implemented.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| .WhereIf(request.VisibleAfter.HasValue, x => request.VisibleAfter <= x.VisibleFrom) | ||
| .WhereIf(request.VisibleBefore.HasValue, x => x.VisibleFrom <= request.VisibleBefore) | ||
| .WhereIf(!request.SystemLabel.IsNullOrEmpty(), x => request.SystemLabel!.Contains(x.DialogEndUserContext.SystemLabelId)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Prevent potential null reference exception when accessing DialogEndUserContext
When accessing x.DialogEndUserContext.SystemLabelId, ensure that DialogEndUserContext is not null to avoid a NullReferenceException. Consider adding a null check for x.DialogEndUserContext.
Apply this diff to add the null check:
-.WhereIf(!request.SystemLabel.IsNullOrEmpty(), x => request.SystemLabel!.Contains(x.DialogEndUserContext.SystemLabelId))
+.WhereIf(!request.SystemLabel.IsNullOrEmpty(), x => x.DialogEndUserContext != null && request.SystemLabel!.Contains(x.DialogEndUserContext.SystemLabelId))📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| .WhereIf(!request.SystemLabel.IsNullOrEmpty(), x => request.SystemLabel!.Contains(x.DialogEndUserContext.SystemLabelId)) | |
| .WhereIf(!request.SystemLabel.IsNullOrEmpty(), x => x.DialogEndUserContext != null && request.SystemLabel!.Contains(x.DialogEndUserContext.SystemLabelId)) |
| @@ -177,9 +184,10 @@ public async Task<SearchDialogResult> Handle(SearchDialogQuery request, Cancella | |||
| .WhereIf(request.UpdatedBefore.HasValue, x => x.UpdatedAt <= request.UpdatedBefore) | |||
| .WhereIf(request.DueAfter.HasValue, x => request.DueAfter <= x.DueAt) | |||
| .WhereIf(request.DueBefore.HasValue, x => x.DueAt <= request.DueBefore) | |||
| .WhereIf(request.Process is not null, x => EF.Functions.ILike(x.Process!, request.Process!)) | |||
| .WhereIf(request.Process is not null, x => EF.Functions.ILike(x.Process!, request.Process!)) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle potential null values in x.Process when using EF.Functions.ILike
In the WhereIf clause, x.Process! uses the null-forgiving operator. If x.Process can be null, this may lead to unexpected behavior or exceptions. Consider adding a null check to ensure x.Process is not null before applying ILike.
Apply this diff to handle null values safely:
-.WhereIf(request.Process is not null, x => EF.Functions.ILike(x.Process!, request.Process!))
+.WhereIf(request.Process is not null, x => x.Process != null && EF.Functions.ILike(x.Process, request.Process!))📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| .WhereIf(request.Process is not null, x => EF.Functions.ILike(x.Process!, request.Process!)) | |
| .WhereIf(request.Process is not null, x => x.Process != null && EF.Functions.ILike(x.Process, request.Process!)) |
| /// <summary> | ||
| /// Filter by Display state | ||
| /// </summary> | ||
| public List<SystemLabel.Values>? SystemLabel { get; set; } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure consistency in property accessors
The SystemLabel property uses get; set;, whereas other properties in the SearchDialogQuery class use get; init;. For consistency and to maintain immutability after initialization, consider changing set; to init; unless modification after object creation is intended.
Apply this diff to maintain consistency:
public List<SystemLabel.Values>? SystemLabel { get; set; }
+public List<SystemLabel.Values>? SystemLabel { get; init; }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
|
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.csproj
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ten.Application/Features/V1/EndUser/DialogLabelAssigmentLog/Queries/Search/MappingProfile.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 17
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/EndUser/DialogSystemLabels/Commands/Set/SetDialogSystemLabelCommand.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/EndUser/DialogSystemLabels/Commands/Set/SetDialogSystemLabelDto.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Create/CreateDialogCommand.cs (4 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Update/UpdateDialogCommand.cs (7 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/DialogEndUserContexts/Entities/DialogEndUserContext.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20241002134750_AddSystemLabel.Designer.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20241002134750_AddSystemLabel.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/DialogDbContextModelSnapshot.cs (6 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (20)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/EndUser/DialogSystemLabels/Commands/Set/SetDialogSystemLabelCommand.cs (2)
65-66: Verify the concurrency check is applied to the correct entityCurrently, the concurrency check is enabled on
dialog.DialogEndUserContextusingrequest.IfMatchDialogRevision. Confirm thatIfMatchDialogRevisioncorresponds to the revision token ofDialogEndUserContext. If the concurrency token is associated withdialogitself, consider applying the concurrency check todialoginstead.
61-61:⚠️ Potential issueHandle potential null
currentUserInformationThe method
GetCurrentUserInformationmay returnnull. AccessingcurrentUserInformation.UserIdwithout checking fornullcould lead to aNullReferenceException. Ensure that you check fornullbefore usingcurrentUserInformation.Apply this diff to add a null check:
var currentUserInformation = await _userRegistry.GetCurrentUserInformation(cancellationToken); + if (currentUserInformation == null) + { + return new DomainError("User information could not be retrieved."); + }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Create/CreateDialogCommand.cs (3)
5-5: Addition of necessary using directivesThe added using statements are appropriate and necessary for the new functionality.
Also applies to: 8-8, 11-11
35-35: Injection ofIUserdependency intoCreateDialogCommandHandlerIntroducing the
IUserdependency enables access to user-specific information required for creating the dialog's end-user context. The dependency is correctly injected and assigned.Also applies to: 38-38, 46-46
72-72: Invocation ofCreateDialogEndUserContextmethodCalling the
CreateDialogEndUserContextmethod integrates the end-user context creation into the dialog handling process appropriately.src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20241002134750_AddSystemLabel.cs (4)
52-73: Review nullable constraints and foreign keys inDialogEndUserContext
- The
DialogIdcolumn is nullable, but there's a foreign key constraint withonDelete: ReferentialAction.SetNull. Verify if this is the intended behavior.- Ensure that records in
DialogEndUserContextare meaningful whenDialogIdisNULL.- The foreign key on
SystemLabelIdusesReferentialAction.Restrict. Confirm if this aligns with the desired cascade behavior.
97-110: Assess the impact of updating existingDialogStatusdataModifying the
Namevalues from "Signing" to "Draft" and "Processing" to "Sent" could affect existing logic that relies on these statuses.
- Ensure that all application logic and business processes are updated to reflect these changes.
- Consider data migration strategies to handle any dependencies.
148-155: Verify nullable foreign key constraint onLabelAssignmentLogIdThe
Actortable has a nullableLabelAssignmentLogId, but the foreign key enforcesonDelete: ReferentialAction.Cascade. Ensure that this is appropriate and doesn't lead to unintended deletions when aLabelAssignmentLogis removed.
170-217: EnsureDownmigration properly reverses all changesReview the
Downmethod to confirm that it accurately and completely reverses all operations performed in theUpmethod, including:
- Dropping all added columns and tables.
- Reverting data updates made to the
DialogStatustable.src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Update/UpdateDialogCommand.cs (2)
Line range hint
38-54: Proper Implementation of Dependency InjectionThe addition of the
IUserdependency and its assignment in the constructor follow best practices for dependency injection. The null check ensures robustness.
152-152: Ensure Errors fromUpdateLabelAre Handled Before SavingEnsure that any domain errors added within
UpdateLabelare appropriately handled before proceeding to save changes.src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/DialogDbContextModelSnapshot.cs (7)
195-232: Entity Definition forDialogEndUserContextIs CorrectThe
DialogEndUserContextentity is properly defined with all the necessary properties, primary key, indices, and table mapping. The use ofHasDefaultValueSqlfor generating UUIDs and timestamps ensures consistent default values.
266-296:SystemLabelEntity and Data SeedingThe
SystemLabelentity is correctly set up with required properties and primary key. The seeding of initial data with IDs and Names (Default,Bin,Archive) aligns with the requirements to manage dialog visibility through labeling.
1321-1333: Inheritance Implementation forLabelAssignmentLogActorThe
LabelAssignmentLogActorentity correctly inherits from theActorbase class. The unique index onLabelAssignmentLogIdensures a one-to-one relationship, which is appropriate for tracking who performed the label assignment action.
1511-1527: Relationship Configuration forDialogEndUserContextThe relationships are properly configured:
- The one-to-one relationship between
DialogEndUserContextandDialogEntityuses a nullable foreign key withOnDelete(DeleteBehavior.SetNull), which is suitable if a dialog can exist without an associated end-user context.- The mandatory relationship with
SystemLabelensures that everyDialogEndUserContextis associated with aSystemLabel, enforcing data integrity.
1529-1539: Cascade Delete Behavior forLabelAssignmentLog
LabelAssignmentLoghas a required relationship withDialogEndUserContextwithOnDelete(DeleteBehavior.Cascade). This setup implies that when aDialogEndUserContextis deleted, all associatedLabelAssignmentLogentries will also be deleted, which is appropriate for maintaining data consistency.
1757-1767: Association BetweenLabelAssignmentLogandLabelAssignmentLogActorThe one-to-one relationship between
LabelAssignmentLogandLabelAssignmentLogActoris correctly established with a cascade delete behavior. This ensures that when aLabelAssignmentLogis deleted, the associated actor record is also removed.
1896-1906: Navigation Properties forDialogEndUserContextandLabelAssignmentLogThe navigation properties are appropriately configured:
DialogEndUserContextincludes a collection ofLabelAssignmentLogs, allowing access to all label assignments related to the context.LabelAssignmentLoghas a required navigation toPerformedBy, ensuring that every label assignment action is associated with an actor.src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20241002134750_AddSystemLabel.Designer.cs (2)
1515-1530: ConfirmOnDeleteBehavior for Foreign KeysThe
OnDelete(DeleteBehavior.SetNull)on theDialogIdforeign key means that when aDialogis deleted, theDialogIdinDialogEndUserContextwill be set to null. Similarly,OnDelete(DeleteBehavior.Restrict)onSystemLabelIdprevents deletion of aSystemLabelif it's referenced.Ensure this behavior aligns with the domain requirements. If orphaned
DialogEndUserContextrecords are undesirable, consider changing the delete behavior.// Change DeleteBehavior if needed: - .OnDelete(DeleteBehavior.SetNull); + .OnDelete(DeleteBehavior.Cascade);
283-299: Verify Data Seeding forSystemLabelThe migration seeds the
SystemLabeltable with IDs 1, 2, and 3 for "Default", "Bin", and "Archive". Ensure that these IDs do not conflict with existing data, especially in databases that may already have entries with these IDs.Run the following script to check for existing IDs:
| using System.Diagnostics.CodeAnalysis; | ||
| using Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain.DialogEndUserContexts.Entities; | ||
|
|
||
| namespace Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.Features.V1.EndUser.DialogSystemLabels.Commands.Set; | ||
|
|
||
| public class SetDialogSystemLabelDto | ||
| { | ||
| public Guid DialogId { get; set; } | ||
| public SystemLabel.Values Label { get; set; } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
💡 Codebase verification
Remove Unused Namespace
The System.Diagnostics.CodeAnalysis namespace is imported but not used in the SetDialogSystemLabelDto class. Please remove this unused using directive to clean up the code.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Consider adding XML documentation.
The SetDialogSystemLabelDto class is well-structured and follows C# naming conventions. The properties are appropriately defined for a DTO. However, to improve code documentation, consider adding XML comments for the class and its properties.
Here's a suggestion for adding XML documentation:
/// <summary>
/// Data Transfer Object for setting a system label on a dialog.
/// </summary>
public class SetDialogSystemLabelDto
{
/// <summary>
/// Gets or sets the unique identifier of the dialog.
/// </summary>
public Guid DialogId { get; set; }
/// <summary>
/// Gets or sets the system label to be applied to the dialog.
/// </summary>
public SystemLabel.Values Label { get; set; }
}Let's verify the usage of the imported namespaces:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of imported namespaces in the file.
# Test 1: Check for usage of System.Diagnostics.CodeAnalysis
echo "Checking usage of System.Diagnostics.CodeAnalysis:"
rg --type csharp -n "NotNullWhen" src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/EndUser/DialogSystemLabels/Commands/Set/SetDialogSystemLabelDto.cs
# Test 2: Check for usage of Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain.DialogEndUserContexts.Entities
echo "Checking usage of Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain.DialogEndUserContexts.Entities:"
rg --type csharp -n "SystemLabel" src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/EndUser/DialogSystemLabels/Commands/Set/SetDialogSystemLabelDto.cs
Length of output: 794
| { | ||
| ActorTypeId = actorType, | ||
| ActorId = userId | ||
| } | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Include ActorName in PerformedBy for comprehensive logging
The ActorName property is not being set in the PerformedBy object when logging label assignments. Including the ActorName can provide more detailed information about who performed the action.
Consider adding a userName parameter to the UpdateLabel method and setting the ActorName property in both label assignment logs.
Apply the following changes:
public void UpdateLabel(SystemLabel.Values newLabel, string userId, ActorType.Values actorType = ActorType.Values.PartyRepresentative)
{
+ // Add a 'userName' parameter
+ public void UpdateLabel(SystemLabel.Values newLabel, string userId, string? userName, ActorType.Values actorType = ActorType.Values.PartyRepresentative)
var currentLabel = SystemLabelId;
if (newLabel == currentLabel)
{
return;
}
// remove old label then add new one
if (currentLabel != SystemLabel.Values.Default)
{
_labelAssignmentLogs.Add(new()
{
Name = currentLabel.ToNamespacedName(),
Action = "remove",
PerformedBy = new()
{
ActorTypeId = actorType,
ActorId = userId,
+ ActorName = userName,
}
});
}
if (newLabel != SystemLabel.Values.Default)
{
_labelAssignmentLogs.Add(new()
{
Name = newLabel.ToNamespacedName(),
Action = "set",
PerformedBy = new()
{
ActorTypeId = actorType,
ActorId = userId,
+ ActorName = userName,
}
});
}
SystemLabelId = newLabel;
}Also applies to: 57-61
...plication/Features/V1/EndUser/DialogSystemLabels/Commands/Set/SetDialogSystemLabelCommand.cs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| private void CreateDialogEndUserContext(CreateDialogCommand request, DialogEntity dialog) | ||
| { | ||
| dialog.DialogEndUserContext = new(); | ||
| if (!request.SystemLabel.HasValue) | ||
| { | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (!_user.TryGetOrganizationNumber(out var organizationNumber)) | ||
| { | ||
| _domainContext.AddError(new DomainFailure(nameof(organizationNumber), "Cannot find organization number for current user.")); | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| dialog.DialogEndUserContext.UpdateLabel( | ||
| request.SystemLabel.Value, | ||
| $"{NorwegianOrganizationIdentifier.PrefixWithSeparator}{organizationNumber}", | ||
| ActorType.Values.ServiceOwner); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Initialize DialogEndUserContext only when SystemLabel is provided
Currently, dialog.DialogEndUserContext is initialized even when request.SystemLabel is not set. This may lead to unnecessary object creation when no system label is provided. Consider initializing it only when SystemLabel has a value.
Apply this diff to initialize DialogEndUserContext conditionally:
private void CreateDialogEndUserContext(CreateDialogCommand request, DialogEntity dialog)
{
- dialog.DialogEndUserContext = new();
if (!request.SystemLabel.HasValue)
{
return;
}
+ dialog.DialogEndUserContext = new();
if (!_user.TryGetOrganizationNumber(out var organizationNumber))
{
_domainContext.AddError(new DomainFailure(nameof(organizationNumber), "Cannot find organization number for current user."));
return;
}
dialog.DialogEndUserContext.UpdateLabel(
request.SystemLabel.Value,
$"{NorwegianOrganizationIdentifier.PrefixWithSeparator}{organizationNumber}",
ActorType.Values.ServiceOwner);
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| private void CreateDialogEndUserContext(CreateDialogCommand request, DialogEntity dialog) | |
| { | |
| dialog.DialogEndUserContext = new(); | |
| if (!request.SystemLabel.HasValue) | |
| { | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| if (!_user.TryGetOrganizationNumber(out var organizationNumber)) | |
| { | |
| _domainContext.AddError(new DomainFailure(nameof(organizationNumber), "Cannot find organization number for current user.")); | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| dialog.DialogEndUserContext.UpdateLabel( | |
| request.SystemLabel.Value, | |
| $"{NorwegianOrganizationIdentifier.PrefixWithSeparator}{organizationNumber}", | |
| ActorType.Values.ServiceOwner); | |
| } | |
| private void CreateDialogEndUserContext(CreateDialogCommand request, DialogEntity dialog) | |
| { | |
| if (!request.SystemLabel.HasValue) | |
| { | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| dialog.DialogEndUserContext = new(); | |
| if (!_user.TryGetOrganizationNumber(out var organizationNumber)) | |
| { | |
| _domainContext.AddError(new DomainFailure(nameof(organizationNumber), "Cannot find organization number for current user.")); | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| dialog.DialogEndUserContext.UpdateLabel( | |
| request.SystemLabel.Value, | |
| $"{NorwegianOrganizationIdentifier.PrefixWithSeparator}{organizationNumber}", | |
| ActorType.Values.ServiceOwner); | |
| } |
| name: "PrecedingProcess", | ||
| table: "Dialog", | ||
| type: "character varying(255)", | ||
| maxLength: 255, | ||
| nullable: true); | ||
|
|
||
| migrationBuilder.AddColumn<string>( | ||
| name: "Process", | ||
| table: "Dialog", | ||
| type: "character varying(255)", | ||
| maxLength: 255, | ||
| nullable: true); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid using potential reserved keywords as column names
The columns Process and PrecedingProcess might conflict with reserved keywords in SQL databases. While they may not cause issues in all database systems, it's a good practice to avoid using such names to prevent potential conflicts in the future.
Consider renaming the columns to more specific names like ProcessName and PrecedingProcessName.
| { | ||
| var attachment = _mapper.Map<DialogAttachment>(attachmentDto); | ||
| attachment.Urls = _mapper.Map<List<AttachmentUrl>>(attachmentDto.Urls); | ||
| return attachment; | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add Null Check for attachmentDto.Urls
When mapping attachmentDto.Urls, consider adding a null check to avoid potential NullReferenceException if Urls is null.
Modify the code as follows:
var attachment = _mapper.Map<DialogAttachment>(attachmentDto);
-attachment.Urls = _mapper.Map<List<AttachmentUrl>>(attachmentDto.Urls);
+attachment.Urls = _mapper.Map<List<AttachmentUrl>>(attachmentDto.Urls) ?? new List<AttachmentUrl>();
return attachment;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| { | |
| var attachment = _mapper.Map<DialogAttachment>(attachmentDto); | |
| attachment.Urls = _mapper.Map<List<AttachmentUrl>>(attachmentDto.Urls); | |
| return attachment; | |
| }); | |
| { | |
| var attachment = _mapper.Map<DialogAttachment>(attachmentDto); | |
| attachment.Urls = _mapper.Map<List<AttachmentUrl>>(attachmentDto.Urls) ?? new List<AttachmentUrl>(); | |
| return attachment; | |
| }); |
|
|
||
| if (!_user.TryGetOrganizationNumber(out var organizationNumber)) | ||
| { | ||
| _domainContext.AddError(new DomainFailure(nameof(organizationNumber), "Cannot find organization number for current user.")); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Clarify Error Message for Missing Organization Number
The error message could be more informative to aid in debugging.
Consider revising the error message:
-_domainContext.AddError(new DomainFailure(nameof(organizationNumber), "Cannot find organization number for current user."));
+_domainContext.AddError(new DomainFailure(nameof(organizationNumber), "Organization number for the current user could not be found. Ensure the user is authenticated and has an associated organization number."));📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| _domainContext.AddError(new DomainFailure(nameof(organizationNumber), "Cannot find organization number for current user.")); | |
| _domainContext.AddError(new DomainFailure(nameof(organizationNumber), "Organization number for the current user could not be found. Ensure the user is authenticated and has an associated organization number.")); |
| if (!_user.TryGetOrganizationNumber(out var organizationNumber)) | ||
| { | ||
| _domainContext.AddError(new DomainFailure(nameof(organizationNumber), "Cannot find organization number for current user.")); | ||
| return; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential Null Reference Exception on DialogEndUserContext
Before calling UpdateLabel on dialog.DialogEndUserContext, verify that DialogEndUserContext is not null to prevent a possible NullReferenceException.
Apply this diff to include a null check:
if (!_user.TryGetOrganizationNumber(out var organizationNumber))
{
_domainContext.AddError(new DomainFailure(nameof(organizationNumber), "Organization number not found for the current user."));
return;
}
+if (dialog.DialogEndUserContext == null)
+{
+ _domainContext.AddError(new DomainFailure(nameof(dialog.DialogEndUserContext), "DialogEndUserContext is null."));
+ return;
+}
dialog.DialogEndUserContext.UpdateLabel(
SystemLabel.Values.Default,
$"{NorwegianOrganizationIdentifier.PrefixWithSeparator}{organizationNumber}",
ActorType.Values.ServiceOwner);Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| b.Navigation("DialogEndUserContext") | ||
| .IsRequired(); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Inconsistency in DialogEndUserContext Navigation Property
The navigation property DialogEndUserContext in DialogEntity is marked as required using .IsRequired(). However, the foreign key DialogId in DialogEndUserContext is nullable (Guid?), and the relationship uses OnDelete(DeleteBehavior.SetNull), indicating that the association is optional.
This inconsistency between the required navigation property and the nullable foreign key may lead to runtime errors or unintended behavior.
Apply this diff to make the DialogEndUserContext navigation property optional:
-b.Navigation("DialogEndUserContext")
- .IsRequired();
+b.Navigation("DialogEndUserContext");📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| b.Navigation("DialogEndUserContext") | |
| .IsRequired(); | |
| b.Navigation("DialogEndUserContext"); | |
| b.Property<int>("SystemLabelId") | ||
| .HasColumnType("integer"); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure SystemLabelId Handles Existing Data Appropriately
The SystemLabelId property in DialogEndUserContext is non-nullable and does not have a default value. If there are existing DialogEndUserContext records, this migration may fail due to the lack of a value for SystemLabelId.
Consider setting a default value or making the field nullable to handle existing records:
- b.Property<int>("SystemLabelId")
+ b.Property<int?>("SystemLabelId")Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
Description
Related Issue(s)
#841
Verification
Documentation
docs-directory, Altinnpedia or a separate linked PR in altinn-studio-docs., if applicable)Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores