Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Serve compressed assets in dist mode #214

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 29, 2018

Conversation

mwistrand
Copy link
Contributor

Type: feature

The following has been addressed in the PR:

  • There is a related issue
  • All code has been formatted with prettier
  • Unit or Functional tests are included in the PR

Description:

When serving in dist mode without memory watch, use express-static-gzip instead of express.static in order to serve compressed build files.

Resolves #206

When serving in dist mode without memory watch, use express-static-gzip
instead of express.static in order to serve compressed build files.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 29, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #214 into master will increase coverage by 0.55%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master    #214      +/-   ##
=========================================
+ Coverage   53.65%   54.2%   +0.55%     
=========================================
  Files          10      10              
  Lines         589     594       +5     
  Branches      143     145       +2     
=========================================
+ Hits          316     322       +6     
+ Misses        273     272       -1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/main.ts 92.09% <100%> (+0.81%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ba15007...09cc8d7. Read the comment docs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants