Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix system_name in bindgen #2387

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 6, 2024
Merged

fix system_name in bindgen #2387

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 6, 2024

Conversation

wighawag
Copy link
Contributor

@wighawag wighawag commented Sep 5, 2024

Description

Fixing a typo

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved error logging for better clarity by including the system name in error messages during contract component definition.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 5, 2024

Walkthrough

Ohayo, sensei! The change involves an update to the error logging within the defineContractComponents function. The error message has been made more specific by including the system_name, enhancing the clarity of error reporting. The overall control flow and error handling logic remain unchanged.

Changes

Files Change Summary
crates/dojo-bindgen/src/plugins/typescript/mod.rs Updated error logging in defineContractComponents to include system_name for better context.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant System
    User->>System: Trigger spawn operation
    System->>System: Execute defineContractComponents
    alt Error occurs
        System->>System: Log error with system_name
        System->>User: Rethrow error
    end
Loading

Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 37887c9 and 5c99c04.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • crates/dojo-bindgen/src/plugins/typescript/mod.rs (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
crates/dojo-bindgen/src/plugins/typescript/mod.rs (1)

449-449: Verify the integration of system_name in error logging.

Ohayo! The change to include system_name in the error logging is a wise move for better clarity. However, let's ensure that the system_name is dynamically captured and accurately reflects the context of the error. This will greatly aid in debugging and maintaining the system's integrity.

Run the following script to verify the dynamic capture of system_name:

Verification successful

Integration of system_name in error logging is correct.

Ohayo, sensei! The change to include system_name in the error logging is well-implemented. The system_name is dynamically captured and accurately reflects the context of the error, enhancing clarity and aiding in debugging. Everything is in harmony with the dojo's standards.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the dynamic capture of `system_name` in error logging.

# Test: Search for the usage of `system_name` in error logging. Expect: Dynamic capture of `system_name`.
rg --type rust -A 5 $'system_name'

Length of output: 5591


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Collaborator

@glihm glihm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch, thank you @wighawag.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 5, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 68.30%. Comparing base (c5665d9) to head (5c99c04).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
crates/dojo-bindgen/src/plugins/typescript/mod.rs 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2387   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   68.30%   68.30%           
=======================================
  Files         357      357           
  Lines       47181    47181           
=======================================
  Hits        32225    32225           
  Misses      14956    14956           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@glihm glihm merged commit 72002a2 into dojoengine:main Sep 6, 2024
14 of 15 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants