Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

C# 6.0: remove await restriction for catch and finally clauses #3

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 13, 2021

Conversation

BillWagner
Copy link
Member

This is all that's needed to allow await in finally and catch clauses.

This is all that's needed to allow `await` in `finally` and `catch` clauses.
@BillWagner
Copy link
Member Author

@jskeet This (very small) PR is ready for committee approval.

BillWagner added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 30, 2020
An edit from await in catch and finally clauses (#3) snuck in.
BillWagner added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 30, 2020
An edit for await in catch and finally clauses (#3) snuck into this PR
@jskeet jskeet added the meeting: discuss This issue should be discussed at the next TC49-TG2 meeting label Dec 9, 2020
@RexJaeschke RexJaeschke merged commit f8026d4 into draft-v6 Jan 13, 2021
@RexJaeschke RexJaeschke deleted the feature-await-finally branch January 13, 2021 20:27
BillWagner added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 17, 2021
An edit for await in catch and finally clauses (#3) snuck into this PR
BillWagner added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 17, 2021
An edit from await in catch and finally clauses (#3) snuck in.
BillWagner added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2021
An edit for await in catch and finally clauses (#3) snuck into this PR
BillWagner added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2021
…thod for initializers. (#8)

* specification for initializers

* revert a mistaken edit

An edit for await in catch and finally clauses (#3) snuck into this PR

* fix merge mistakes.

* one more merge mistake.

* Avoid "index initializer" as a non-defined term

* Require Add to be a method, not a property.

* Update standard/expressions.md

* fix section reference.

Co-authored-by: Jon Skeet <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
meeting: discuss This issue should be discussed at the next TC49-TG2 meeting
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants