Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow set operations over other mapping types #16813

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 1, 2019
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
34 changes: 14 additions & 20 deletions src/EFCore.Relational/Query/SqlExpressions/SelectExpression.cs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -452,17 +452,24 @@ public Expression ApplySetOperation(
continue;
}

if (joinedMapping.Value1 is ColumnExpression && joinedMapping.Value2 is ColumnExpression
|| joinedMapping.Value1 is ScalarSubqueryExpression && joinedMapping.Value2 is ScalarSubqueryExpression)
if (joinedMapping.Value1 is SqlExpression innerColumn1
&& joinedMapping.Value2 is SqlExpression innerColumn2)
{
handleColumnMapping(
joinedMapping.Key,
select1, (SqlExpression)joinedMapping.Value1,
select2, (SqlExpression)joinedMapping.Value2);
// For now, make sure that both sides output the same store type, otherwise the query may fail.
// TODO: with #15586 we'll be able to also allow different store types which are implicitly convertible to one another.
if (innerColumn1.TypeMapping.StoreType != innerColumn2.TypeMapping.StoreType)
{
throw new InvalidOperationException("Set operations over different store types are currently unsupported");
}

var alias = joinedMapping.Key.Last?.Name;
select1.AddToProjection(innerColumn1, alias);
select2.AddToProjection(innerColumn2, alias);
_projectionMapping[joinedMapping.Key] = innerColumn1;
continue;
}

throw new InvalidOperationException("Non-matching or unknown projection mapping type in set operation");
throw new InvalidOperationException($"Non-matching or unknown projection mapping type in set operation ({joinedMapping.Value1.GetType().Name} and {joinedMapping.Value2.GetType().Name})");
}
}

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -520,19 +527,6 @@ ColumnExpression addSetOperationColumnProjections(

return column1;
}

void handleColumnMapping(
ProjectionMember projectionMember,
SelectExpression select1, SqlExpression innerColumn1,
SelectExpression select2, SqlExpression innerColumn2)
{
// The actual columns may actually be different, but we don't care as long as the type and alias
// coming out of the two operands are the same
var alias = projectionMember.Last?.Name;
select1.AddToProjection(innerColumn1, alias);
select2.AddToProjection(innerColumn2, alias);
_projectionMapping[projectionMember] = innerColumn1;
}
}

public IDictionary<SqlExpression, ColumnExpression> PushdownIntoSubquery()
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -40,5 +40,7 @@ public override void Include_Union_only_on_one_side_throws() {}
public override void Include_Union_different_includes_throws() {}
public override Task SubSelect_Union(bool isAsync) => Task.CompletedTask;
public override Task Client_eval_Union_FirstOrDefault(bool isAsync) => Task.CompletedTask;
public override Task GroupBy_Select_Union(bool isAsync) => Task.CompletedTask;
public override Task Union_over_different_projection_types(bool isAsync, string leftType, string rightType) => Task.CompletedTask;
}
}
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -217,6 +217,16 @@ public override Task Select_Except_reference_projection(bool isAsync)
return Task.CompletedTask; //base.Select_Except_reference_projection(isAsync);
}

public override Task GroupBy_Select_Union(bool isAsync)
{
return Task.CompletedTask; //base.GroupBy_Select_Union(isAsync);
}

public override Task Union_over_different_projection_types(bool isAsync, string leftType, string rightType)
{
return Task.CompletedTask; //base.Union_over_different_projection_types(isAsync);
}

#endregion

[ConditionalFact(Skip = "Issue#16564")]
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0. See License.txt in the project root for license information.

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.TestModels.Northwind;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -339,5 +340,60 @@ public virtual Task Client_eval_Union_FirstOrDefault(bool isAsync)
.Union(cs));

private static Customer ClientSideMethod(Customer c) => c;

[ConditionalTheory]
[MemberData(nameof(IsAsyncData))]
public virtual Task GroupBy_Select_Union(bool isAsync)
=> AssertQuery<Customer>(isAsync, cs => cs
.Where(c => c.City == "Berlin")
.GroupBy(c => c.CustomerID)
.Select(g => new { CustomerID = g.Key, Count = g.Count() })
.Union(cs
.Where(c => c.City == "London")
.GroupBy(c => c.CustomerID)
.Select(g => new { CustomerID = g.Key, Count = g.Count() })));

[ConditionalTheory]
[MemberData(nameof(GetSetOperandTestCases))]
public virtual Task Union_over_different_projection_types(bool isAsync, string leftType, string rightType)
roji marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
roji marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
{
var (left, right) = (ExpressionGenerator(leftType), ExpressionGenerator(rightType));
return AssertQuery<Order>(isAsync, os => left(os).Union(right(os)));

static Func<IQueryable<Order>, IQueryable<object>> ExpressionGenerator(string expressionType)
{
switch (expressionType)
{
case "Column":
return os => os.Select(o => (object)o.OrderID);
case "Function":
return os => os
.GroupBy(o => o.OrderID)
.Select(g => (object)g.Count());
case "Constant":
return os => os.Select(o => (object)8);
case "Unary":
return os => os.Select(o => (object)-o.OrderID);
case "Binary":
return os => os.Select(o => (object)(o.OrderID + 1));
case "ScalarSubquery":
return os => os.Select(o => (object)o.OrderDetails.Count());
default:
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
}

private static IEnumerable<object[]> GetSetOperandTestCases()
=> from async in new[] { true, false }
from leftType in SupportedOperandExpressionType
from rightType in SupportedOperandExpressionType
select new object[] { async, leftType, rightType };

// ReSharper disable once StaticMemberInGenericType
private static readonly string[] SupportedOperandExpressionType =
{
"Column", "Function", "Constant", "Unary", "Binary", "ScalarSubquery"
};
}
}
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -334,5 +334,67 @@ FROM [Orders] AS [o0]
WHERE ([c0].[CustomerID] = [o0].[CustomerID]) AND [o0].[CustomerID] IS NOT NULL) AS [Orders]
FROM [Customers] AS [c0]");
}

public override async Task GroupBy_Select_Union(bool isAsync)
{
await base.GroupBy_Select_Union(isAsync);

AssertSql(
@"SELECT [c].[CustomerID], COUNT(*) AS [Count]
FROM [Customers] AS [c]
WHERE ([c].[City] = N'Berlin') AND [c].[City] IS NOT NULL
GROUP BY [c].[CustomerID]
UNION
SELECT [c0].[CustomerID], COUNT(*) AS [Count]
FROM [Customers] AS [c0]
WHERE ([c0].[City] = N'London') AND [c0].[City] IS NOT NULL
GROUP BY [c0].[CustomerID]");
}

public override async Task Union_over_different_projection_types(bool isAsync, string leftType, string rightType)
{
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Asserting Sqls dynamically like this is nightmare to maintain test.
So we are down to 2 choice. Either split out each into different tests (sync/async can be together like other tests)
or run loops to generate queries to execute one by one. Essentially removing leftType/rightType from parameter of the test.

Like Convert_ToDecimal test

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would have been better to receive this previously as I was asking for feedback.

To be sure I understand, you're saying it's more maintainable for us to have 72 manually-written SQL assertions? For comparison, Convert_ToDecimal has 8.

If you're not happy with the way the test looks, let me propose something. All of these test cases/assertions don't actually correspond to different code paths inside - the actual set operation logic doesn't care one bit if one side is a constant, a column, or a function call - as long as they return the same thing. In other words, coverage isn't actually increased. Maybe a single test per expression type (on both sides), plus one extra for different expression types could be sufficient.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should go with the tests as @roji has written them for now. We can file an issue to discuss as a team whether we in general like this pattern or not, and then follow up appropriately.

await base.Union_over_different_projection_types(isAsync, leftType, rightType);

var leftSql = GenerateSql(leftType);
var rightSql = GenerateSql(rightType);

// Fix up right-side SQL as table aliases shift
rightSql = leftType == "ScalarSubquery"
? rightSql.Replace("[o]", "[o1]").Replace("[o0]", "[o2]")
: rightSql.Replace("[o0]", "[o1]").Replace("[o]", "[o0]");

AssertSql(leftSql + Environment.NewLine + "UNION" + Environment.NewLine + rightSql);

static string GenerateSql(string expressionType)
{
switch (expressionType)
{
case "Column":
return @"SELECT [o].[OrderID]
FROM [Orders] AS [o]";
case "Function":
return @"SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM [Orders] AS [o]
GROUP BY [o].[OrderID]";
case "Constant":
return @"SELECT 8
FROM [Orders] AS [o]";
case "Unary":
return @"SELECT -[o].[OrderID]
FROM [Orders] AS [o]";
case "Binary":
return @"SELECT [o].[OrderID] + 1
FROM [Orders] AS [o]";
case "ScalarSubquery":
return @"SELECT (
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM [Order Details] AS [o]
WHERE [o0].[OrderID] = [o].[OrderID])
FROM [Orders] AS [o0]";
default:
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
}
}
}