-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Delete some unused cmake defines #103441
Delete some unused cmake defines #103441
Conversation
Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/runtime-infrastructure |
@@ -234,12 +234,9 @@ if(HOST_WIN32) | |||
# Dynamic lookup using ac_check_headers/ac_check_functions is extremly slow on Windows, espacially on msbuild. | |||
# Since majority of the checks above will fail on Windows host, we can just directly define the available static | |||
# API surface. | |||
set(HAVE_ATEXIT 1) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we need this and perhaps the others. Is that correct, @lateralusX ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These are unused. When we need them lets add them then.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In dotnet/runtime perhaps, but they may be used in forks. If that's the case, I'd rather keep it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you point me to the fork you are referring to? The dead code is deleted in this repo. If fork is using it, it should be kept there.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's non-public, unfortunately. I want to make sure it's even used there first. If it's not, then my comment is moot.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not used so should be fine dropping and if ever needed in future we add it downstream.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thank you!
Found with: