-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Re-enable trimming of library tests on Apple mobile #104097
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Re-enable trimming of library tests on Apple mobile #104097
Conversation
/azp run runtime-extra-platforms |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
@@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ | |||
<!-- Forced by ILLink targets --> | |||
<SelfContained>true</SelfContained> | |||
<PublishDir>$(OriginalPublishDir)</PublishDir> | |||
<!-- Prevent getting DynamicCodeSupport=true default from ILLink targets that are imported with the Sdk.targets --> | |||
<DynamicCodeSupport>false</DynamicCodeSupport> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice catch! These are difficult to detect when something goes wrong at runtime.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was under the impression we'd only do AOT on helix, not actual trimming. @steveisok how does this work?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The new default for the property should affect many more cases than just AOT on helix so this doesn't sounds like the correct place for this fix.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was under the impression we'd only do AOT on helix, not actual trimming. @steveisok how does this work?
If you want trimming + AOT on helix, both have to occur in the same place. Otherwise, you have to send individual copies of the trimmed shared framework for each test from the build machine.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That might not be as painful as it seemed initially.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@akoeplinger Since we perform trimming on Helix, we can move this to the Directory.Build.props
file. However, it will not have effect on other components.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've added a default switch to disable trimming on build machines as well. I haven't found a common location where these switches are set in Mono. Since we don't ship Apple mobile support from the runtime repository, the switch is set in the SDK/Xamarin.
A potential place to set this switch could be the AOT compiler props, but they are invoked after the trimming.
/cc: @sbomer
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The ideal solution would be for the AOT compiler props in this repo to be imported before the trimming props, which is how this works in the SDK. But barring that the Directory.Build.props seems like a good place.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The ILLink feature switches are moved to ConfigureTrimming
target.
/azp run runtime-extra-platforms |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
/azp run runtime-extra-platforms |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
/azp run runtime-extra-platforms |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
/azp run runtime-extra-platforms |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Let's revive this PR. Enabling trimming for Apple mobile consolidates it with the default shipping setup and reduces build time on CI. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for trying to revive this!
I agree this is beneficial for reducing our CI resource usage, but before going forward, we might want to also reprioritize and bring closer attention to having better crash/failure logs on iOS platforms testing dotnet/xharness#1188 so that potential new failures caused by trimming are not shadowed by various "Failed USB connection" or "TCP connection failures".
Another idea/option would be to run two jobs with: EnableAggressiveTrimming=true
and EnableAggressiveTrimming=false
on rolling builds, so that if there is a failure when trimming is enabled it can be compared against a non-trimmed variant to improve root cause detection of a failure.
Finally (and ideally) we would have a single source of truth for setting expected default feature switch values for iOS platforms when running tests, which we would keep in sync with: https://github.com/xamarin/xamarin-macios/blob/43768cfcb7e5ff9554a9bfd057f7b4d7a3c10cc7/dotnet/targets/Xamarin.Shared.Sdk.targets#L120
eng/testing/tests.mobile.targets
Outdated
<RuntimeHostConfigurationOption Include="System.Runtime.CompilerServices.RuntimeFeature.IsDynamicCodeSupported" Value="false" /> | ||
<RuntimeHostConfigurationOption Include="System.ComponentModel.DefaultValueAttribute.IsSupported" Value="true" /> | ||
<RuntimeHostConfigurationOption Include="System.ComponentModel.Design.IDesignerHost.IsSupported" Value="true" /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Couple of notes:
- If we want to actually trim codepaths guarded by these feature switches we would also need to set
Trim
attribute totrue
on theseRuntimeHostConfigurationOption
items, as ILLink picks up only those that haveTrim=true
- Another, probably more robust, approach would be to set the actual feature switch properties instead of altering
RuntimeHostConfigurationOption
but that would need to happen really early in the build - at the time of property evaluation, like for example how we setDebuggerSupport
on line 35 above. So we would have<PropertyGroup Condition="'$(EnableAggressiveTrimming)' == 'true' and '$(BuildTestsOnHelix)' != 'true'"> ... </PropertyGroup> <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(EnableAggressiveTrimming)' == 'true' and '$(BuildTestsOnHelix)' == 'true'"> <DynamicCodeSupport>false</DynamicCodeSupport> ... </PropertyGroup>
instead of these RuntimeHostConfigurationOption
overwrites
<!-- Prevent getting defaults from ILLink targets that are imported with the Sdk.targets --> | ||
<RuntimeHostConfigurationOption Include="System.Runtime.CompilerServices.RuntimeFeature.IsDynamicCodeSupported" Value="false" /> | ||
<RuntimeHostConfigurationOption Include="System.ComponentModel.DefaultValueAttribute.IsSupported" Value="true" /> | ||
<RuntimeHostConfigurationOption Include="System.ComponentModel.Design.IDesignerHost.IsSupported" Value="true" /> | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is redundant. If the build on build machines was properly configured ie all feature switches have their values properly set for testing, we carry over RuntimeHostConfigurationOption
to Helix through _AppleUsedRuntimeHostConfigurationOption
item group and set the values in Target Name=_PrepareForAppleBuildAppOnHelix Project=ProxyProjectForAOTOnHelix.proj
when we build on Helix.
eng/testing/tests.mobile.targets
Outdated
<DynamicCodeSupport Condition="'$(DynamicCodeSupport)' == '' and '$(MonoForceInterpreter)' != 'true'">false</DynamicCodeSupport> | ||
<_DefaultValueAttributeSupport Condition="'$(_DefaultValueAttributeSupport)' == ''">true</_DefaultValueAttributeSupport> | ||
<_DesignerHostSupport Condition="'$(_DesignerHostSupport)' == ''">true</_DesignerHostSupport> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FWIW
I think these need to be in a separate property group as I believe BuildTestsOnHelix=true
in our setup.
So based on my previous comment, I think we will need a new property group conditioned with '$(EnableAggressiveTrimming)' == 'true' and '$(BuildTestsOnHelix)' == 'true'
and then add these switches there.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, I missed the condition.
Do we get the same ability to detect a failure by comparing a PR build (with trimming) with rolling build (without trimming)? I would like to avoid reducing cost by introducing an additional cost :)
Yes, that would be ideal. The main question is how to achieve this without manual sync. |
Hm yeah, I see your point.
To tackle this, it would be great if we would have an ability to rerun the same state with trimming disabled, to rule out that as an issue. With something like This is just an idea, probably out-of-scope, just thinking of ways of how to improve the triaging experience. |
/azp run runtime-extra-platforms |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
/azp run runtime-extra-platforms |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Description
This PR re-enables the trimming of library tests on Apple mobile platforms. This change prevents the default settings of ILLink switches from targets that are imported. The regression was introduced in #103594.
Fixes #91923