-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[main] Update dependencies from mono/linker #50232
Merged
eerhardt
merged 6 commits into
main
from
darc-main-c166b29d-6e6b-441c-9f48-b7b243d18ecb
Mar 29, 2021
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
db50866
Update dependencies from https://github.com/mono/linker build 20210324.1
dotnet-maestro[bot] 1c92ebf
Update dependencies from https://github.com/mono/linker build 20210326.1
dotnet-maestro[bot] ee26d45
Update dependencies from https://github.com/mono/linker build 20210327.1
dotnet-maestro[bot] 223e4c0
Add missing annotations
marek-safar 8b33f93
Always keep ValueType constructor
marek-safar 1b6e11f
Fix exceptions descriptors to match what native lookup expects
marek-safar File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't understand why this issue is attached to this entry. The issue says
But this entry is unconditionally preserving the constructor on
ValueType
, which are two different things in my mind.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can remove it from the xml if you want. It's only a reminder to remove it once we land final solution for
System.Runtime.InteropServices.JavaScript.Runtime
dependency.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you explain why we need
ValueType.ctor()
in the xml?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have some tiny sample which managed to not require ValueType hence dropping the required dependency.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd prefer to remove this comment, since it isn't relevant to what is being done here in the xml. I can do that in a follow up PR, so we can merge this to unblock the integration.