Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Override InformationalVersion for NativeAOT corelib too #93889

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 23, 2023

Conversation

akoeplinger
Copy link
Member

We already do this for CoreCLR and Mono since #60572 but we never did this for NativeAOT.
Without this the assembly has a version suffix in the AssemblyInformationalVersionAttribute when using stabilized package versions which caused the processinfo2 and processinfo3 tests to fail.

We already do this for CoreCLR and Mono since dotnet#60572 but we never did this for NativeAOT.
This resulted in the assembly having a version suffix in the AssemblyInformationalVersionAttribute when using stabilized package versions which caused the processinfo2 and processinfo3 tests to fail.
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Oct 23, 2023

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

We already do this for CoreCLR and Mono since #60572 but we never did this for NativeAOT.
Without this the assembly has a version suffix in the AssemblyInformationalVersionAttribute when using stabilized package versions which caused the processinfo2 and processinfo3 tests to fail.

Author: akoeplinger
Assignees: akoeplinger
Labels:

area-NativeAOT-coreclr

Milestone: -

@hoyosjs hoyosjs merged commit 15e4389 into dotnet:main Oct 23, 2023
110 checks passed
@akoeplinger akoeplinger deleted the informationalversion-nativeaot branch October 24, 2023 08:29
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 23, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants