Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question about minimum coverage #154

Open
desmodus1984 opened this issue Jan 8, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Question about minimum coverage #154

desmodus1984 opened this issue Jan 8, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@desmodus1984
Copy link

Hi,

I am interested in finding differentially methylated sites and DM- loci or regions, and the output of MethylDackel is what many programs need. To confidently call DMS or DML/R, it is recommended to only use those with a minimum depth of at least 10 reads. I did process my samples and later I found that there is a similar option for minimum depth: absolute minimum coverage.
When I read about it, I am a little confused, because it states: "absolute minimum coverage, here, defined as the number of methylation calls kept after filtering for MAPQ, phred score, etc.)". I am interested in the number of reads per CpG, and this is the number of methylation calls. It seems that changing it might bias the results, because in my case, I work with an insect with very low average methylation, different from mammals which have a bimodal distribution; in my case is one a very left-skewed beta-binomial distribution with a long tail.
Thus, tell me if I am wrong, setting for instance, setting --minDepth 10, will only retain sites with 10 methylation calls, and then I will lose plenty of sites because methylation levels are very low.

Looking forward to hearing from you how to tackle this issue.

Best regards;

Juan Pablo

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant