Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨ Introduce ip_addresses datasource #159

Merged

Conversation

twink0r
Copy link
Contributor

@twink0r twink0r commented Apr 25, 2022

No description provided.

@fbreckle
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi! Thanks for this nice mr!

I notice that you also parse the tenant attribute of the ip addresses. Can you add a test for this functionality? Just to make sure that the attached tenants are flattened correctly! Else LGTM!

@twink0r
Copy link
Contributor Author

twink0r commented Apr 27, 2022

Sure, I will update the PR and a testcase of this.

@twink0r twink0r force-pushed the implement_ip_addresses_datasource branch from bcc7467 to 63c1c94 Compare April 27, 2022 16:06
@fbreckle fbreckle merged commit 8e1fc7e into e-breuninger:master Apr 27, 2022
@twink0r
Copy link
Contributor Author

twink0r commented May 3, 2022

Is it possible to release a version that contains this data source ?

@fbreckle
Copy link
Collaborator

fbreckle commented May 4, 2022

Yes, I want to merge #158 as well.

@twink0r twink0r deleted the implement_ip_addresses_datasource branch May 4, 2022 10:04
@fbreckle
Copy link
Collaborator

fbreckle commented May 6, 2022

https://github.com/e-breuninger/terraform-provider-netbox/releases/tag/v1.6.3

@nomaster
Copy link

nomaster commented May 6, 2022

Is there documentation missing? Can't find the datasource on https://registry.terraform.io/providers/e-breuninger/netbox/1.6.3/docs

@fbreckle
Copy link
Collaborator

fbreckle commented May 6, 2022

Absolutely. We have an issue in #155 and an ongoing pull request in #165 for that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants