add patch to fix uniq operation in TensorFlow 2.4.1

[Flamefire]

(created using eb --new-pr)

[Micket]

I think the patch is missing.

Any comments on the patch that was removed?

[Flamefire]

Thanks, added. The new patch fixes the actual bug, the old patch did only disable the tests which ran into the bug

[Flamefire]

Test report by @Flamefire
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
taurussmp8 - Linux RHEL 7.7, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8276M CPU @ 2.20GHz (cascadelake), Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/31fb22ef0876f80cfade644662706c3b for a full test report.

[Micket]

lgtm

[Micket]

lgtm

[Micket]

Just to check, was this unique to 2019b?

[Micket]

@boegelbot please test @ generoso
CORE_CNT=16

[boegelbot]

@Micket: Request for testing this PR well received on generoso

PR test command 'EB_PR=13181 EB_ARGS= /apps/slurm/default/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_13181 --ntasks="16" ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 17472

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 862489720 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
generoso-x-2 - Linux centos linux 8.2.2004, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/b14ca8c1f1e92389b438753d061aebe3 for a full test report.

[Flamefire]

Just to check, was this unique to 2019b?

This was the only one where it occured before. With GCC 9+ the issue at least disappeared. I added the same patch to TF 2.5 (new) though.

[Micket]

Going in, thanks @Flamefire!