Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

{cae}[foss/2021a] OpenFOAM v2106 #13266

Conversation

robert-mijakovic
Copy link
Contributor

@robert-mijakovic robert-mijakovic commented Jun 27, 2021

@robert-mijakovic robert-mijakovic changed the title {cae}[foss/2021a] OpenFOAM vv2106 {cae}[foss/2021a] OpenFOAM v2106 Jun 28, 2021
@boegel boegel added the update label Aug 5, 2021
@boegel boegel added this to the 4.x milestone Aug 5, 2021
@boegel boegel mentioned this pull request Aug 5, 2021
@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Aug 14, 2021

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
node3111.skitty.os - Linux centos linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/403541abec92c401c21a40fa29feb692 for a full test report.

@easybuilders easybuilders deleted a comment from boegelbot Aug 14, 2021
@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Aug 14, 2021

@boegelbot please test @ generoso
CORE_CNT=16

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on generoso

PR test command 'EB_PR=13266 EB_ARGS= /apps/slurm/default/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_13266 --ntasks="16" ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 18138

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 898899889 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
FAILED
Build succeeded for 2 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
generoso-x-1 - Linux centos linux 8.2.2004, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/49e11d08493d6834926cd4daeb26d05e for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Aug 17, 2021

First compiler error from the build log of the failing build on generoso (CentOS 8):

/users/boegelbot/CentOS8/haswell/software/CGAL/5.2.2-gompi-2021a/include/CGAL/array.h:72:44: error: std::index_sequence has not been declared
   72 | make_filled_array_aux(const T& value, std::index_sequence<Is...>)
      |                                            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This looks a lot like CGAL/cgal#4974, but that was fixed in CGAL/cgal#4981, which is included in CGAL 5.2.2.

I'm puzzled why this problem only pops up on generoso, and not on our CentOS 7 Intel Skylake cluster (see other test report)... It doesn't like like this is caused by a newer glibc?!

@olesenm Is OpenFOAM v2106 supposed to be compatible yet with CGAL 5.x? For v2012, we were still using CGAL 4.14.3...
(edit: spack/spack#22474 suggests that OpenFOAM still requires CGAL 4.x)

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Aug 18, 2021

@boegelbot please test @ generoso
CORE_CNT=16

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Aug 18, 2021

I've swapped to CGAL 4.14.3 (latest 4.x) as dependency for OpenFOAM v2106, since that seems to work just fine...

I'll also use that same CGAL version for OpenFOAM 9 (even though we used CGAL 5.x there for OpenFOAM 8)

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on generoso

PR test command 'EB_PR=13266 EB_ARGS= /apps/slurm/default/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_13266 --ntasks="16" ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 18149

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 900880206 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
generoso-x-1 - Linux centos linux 8.2.2004, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/5e9abca01ebcddbc8af6e22db0cc5385 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Aug 18, 2021

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node2621.swalot.os - Linux centos linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 v3 @ 2.60GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/b36518d30fc14ad8ef6905524b4bf6cb for a full test report.

Copy link
Member

@branfosj branfosj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0211u08b.bear.cluster - Linux RHEL 8.3, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6248 CPU @ 2.50GHz (cascadelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/cfe7562f107db14aa070c64189034780 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Aug 18, 2021

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
node3502.doduo.os - Linux RHEL 8.2, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7552 48-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/8f175e7f47e235daa86a15137fcdb0d0 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Aug 18, 2021

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 10 out of 10 (3 easyconfigs in total)
node2621.swalot.os - Linux centos linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 v3 @ 2.60GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/362d543b3fcc6a62240e71b13ccc990f for a full test report.

@branfosj branfosj modified the milestones: 4.x, next release (4.4.2?) Aug 18, 2021
@branfosj
Copy link
Member

Going in, thanks @robert-mijakovic!

@branfosj branfosj merged commit dfdf536 into easybuilders:develop Aug 18, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Integrate OpenFOAM-v2106
4 participants